Inter-tibiofibular graft for traumatic segmental bone defect of the tibia

被引:19
作者
Fitoussi, F. [1 ]
Masquelet, A. -C. [2 ]
Rigal, S. [3 ]
Poichotte, A. [4 ]
Bauer, T. [5 ]
Fabre, A.
机构
[1] Hop Robert Debre, Pediat Orthoped Surg Dept, F-75019 Paris, France
[2] Avicenne Hosp, AP HP, Dept Orthoped Surg, F-93009 Bobigny, France
[3] Percy Mil Teaching Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, F-92140 Clamart, France
[4] Loire Vendee Hosp Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, F-85302 Challans, France
[5] Hop Ambroise Pare, AP HP, Dept Orthoped Surg, F-92110 Boulogne, France
关键词
Segmental bone defect; Bone reconstruction; Bone graft; Inter-tibiofibular graft; Bone healing; NON-UNIONS; VASCULARIZED FIBULA; PERSISTENT NONUNION; RECONSTRUCTION; FRACTURES; TRANSPORT; SYNOSTOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The present study sought to assess the interest of inter-tibiofibular graft (ITFG), alternatively called posterolateral bone graft, in traumatic segmental tibial bone defect. Material and methods: Twenty-eight ITFGs were performed in 125 tibial reconstructions for traumatic bone defect. Patient's records were reviewed retrospectively in a multicenter study. Tibial reconstruction with and without ITFG was compared for bone healing and patient's return to full weight-bearing status. Results: There were no failures of bone healing in the ITFG group, versus 14 (14%) in the non-ITFG group. Graft-to-consolidation delays were shorter with first-line ITFG, at a mean 10 months (range, 3-20 months) versus 16.5 months (range, 3-63 months) in the non-ITFG group (P < 0.05). Weight-bearing was likewise more quickly resumed, with full weight-bearing at a mean 9 months (range, 3-19 months) versus 15 months (range, 1-34 moths) respectively (P < 0.05). Return to work was also quicker, at a mean 15 months (range, 4-28 months) versus 27 months (range, 8-56 months) respectively (P < 0.05). Discussion: This study confirmed the interest of ITFG in tibial bone defect reconstruction. ITFG may singly be used for small defects less than 4 cm, or in conjunction with another tibial reconstruction technique; ITFG in the present series achieved consolidation in all cases and significantly shortened the times to return to full weight-bearing status and to work. Level of evidence: III: retrospective case-control study. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Ipsilateral vascularised fibular transport for massive defects of the tibia [J].
Atkins, RM ;
Madhavan, P ;
Sudhakar, J ;
Whitwell, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (06) :1035-1040
[2]   DOUBLE VASCULARIZED FIBULAS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF LARGE TIBIAL DEFECTS [J].
BANIC, A ;
HERTEL, R .
JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 1993, 9 (06) :421-428
[3]   Medial fibula transport with the Ilizarov frame to treat massive tibial bone loss [J].
Catagni, Maurizio A. ;
Camagni, Marco ;
Combi, Alessandro ;
Ottaviani, Giulia .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (448) :208-216
[4]   COMPOUND TIBIAL FRACTURES WITH BONE LOSS TREATED BY THE ILIZAROV TECHNIQUE [J].
DAGHER, F ;
ROUKOZ, S .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02) :316-321
[5]  
EVRARD J, 1992, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V78, P389
[6]  
HARMON PH, 1945, J BONE JOINT SURG, V27, P496
[7]   USE OF THE IPSILATERAL VASCULARIZED FIBULA FOR TIBIAL RECONSTRUCTION [J].
HERTEL, R ;
PISAN, M ;
JAKOB, RP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (06) :914-919
[8]   Case of bone transference. Use of a segment of fibula to supply a defect in the tibia. [J].
Huntington, TW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1905, 41 :249-251
[9]   CANCELLOUS-BONE GRAFTING FOR NON-UNION OF THE TIBIA THROUGH THE POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH [J].
JONES, KG ;
BARNETT, HC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1955, 37 (06) :1250-1260
[10]   Ipsilateral fibular transposition in tibial nonunion using Huntington procedure: a 12-year follow-up study [J].
Kassab, M ;
Samaha, C ;
Saillant, G .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2003, 34 (10) :770-775