Measure it to better manage it: a biodiversity monitoring framework for the Australian rangelands

被引:40
作者
Eyre, Teresa J. [1 ]
Fisher, Alaric [2 ]
Hunt, Leigh P. [3 ]
Kutt, Alex S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Dept Environm & Resource Management, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia
[2] No Terr Dept Nat Resources Environm Arts & Sport, Biodivers Conservat Div, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia
[3] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Trop Ecosystems Res Ctr, Winnellie, NT 0822, Australia
[4] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Aitkenvale, Qld 4814, Australia
关键词
adaptive monitoring; conservation; rangeland condition; rangeland management; reference sites; KAKADU NATIONAL-PARK; NORTHERN-TERRITORY; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; GRAZING RESPONSE; DESIGN ISSUES; SMALL MAMMALS; GROUND COVER; CONSERVATION; SCALE; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1071/RJ10071
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The need for broad-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring to support evidence-based policy and management in the Australian rangelands is clear and pressing but, despite protracted discussion of this need, there has been little progress towards implementation. To prompt real progress, we propose a framework of spatially hierarchical and complementary components that together use a combination of direct and indirect measures of biodiversity and drivers: Targeted monitoring; involving localised field-based monitoring of target species, addressing specific management questions. Surveillance monitoring; involving broad-scale, field-based sampling of multi-taxa and a set of habitat and condition attributes. Landscape-scale monitoring; providing regional to national-scale intelligence on habitat quality and trends in threats to or drivers of biodiversity, with data obtained using systematic ground-based and remote methods. The framework aims to provide information on the response of biodiversity to rangeland management that is relevant to regional, state and national jurisdictions. We believe the characteristics of the proposed framework address many of the pitfalls that often stall biodiversity monitoring in Australia. These characteristics include: clarification of the desired outcomes and management requirements; a strong collaborative partnership that oversees the administration of the framework and ensures long-term commitment; a conceptual model that guides clear and relevant question-setting; careful design and analysis aimed at addressing the set questions; timely and relevant communication and reporting; and, regular data analysis and review, providing an adaptive mechanism for the framework to evolve and remain relevant. The proposed framework can be incrementally implemented at a moderate cost, relative to current total expenditure in natural resource management in the Australian rangelands.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 253
页数:15
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
*ANAO, 2008, 21 ANAO COMM AUSTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT BIOG REG AUSTR I
[3]  
[Anonymous], STATUS BIODIVERSITY
[4]  
Bastin G., 2008, RANGELANDS 2008 TAKI
[5]   The Australian Collaborative Rangelands Information System: preparing for a climate of change [J].
Bastin, G. N. ;
Smith, D. M. Stafford ;
Watson, I. W. ;
Fisher, A. .
RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2009, 31 (01) :111-125
[6]  
Beeton R.J. S., 2006, Australia State of the Environment 2006
[7]   Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species? [J].
Bottrill, Madeleine C. ;
Walsh, Jessica C. ;
Watson, James E. M. ;
Joseph, Liana N. ;
Ortega-Argueta, Alejandro ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (05) :1595-1601
[8]   If you can't measure it, how can you manage it? Management and governance in higher educational institutions [J].
Broadbent, Jane .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (03) :193-198
[9]  
BROWN J, 1998, MONITORING GRAZING L, P57
[10]   Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review [J].
Carignan, V ;
Villard, MA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2002, 78 (01) :45-61