Does minimally invasive coronary artery bypass improve outcomes compared to off-pump coronary bypass via sternotomy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

被引:16
作者
Florisson, Daniel S. [1 ]
DeBono, Joshua A. [1 ]
Davies, Reece A. [1 ]
Newcomb, Andrew E. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Publ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Off-pump coronary artery bypass; Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass; thoraCAB; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Minimally invasive cardiac surgery; REVASCULARIZATION; SURGERY; DISEASE; THORACOTOMY;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivy071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, for single or multivessel disease, does minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) or off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) provide the superior outcome including a reduction in morbidity and mortality?'. A total of 187 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. It was found that compared to OPCAB, MIDCAB surgery can offer decreased intensive care unit length of stay (4.5-57.4 h vs 5.2-52.7 h) and total hospital length of stay (4.5-8.5 days vs 5.2-12 days), with 1 paper showing a decrease in mortality at 1 year (3% vs 14%). However, there were several papers that showed significant risks with MIDCAB surgery in patients with either single or multivessel disease. These include increased risk of incomplete revascularization (29% vs 0%), significant early complications (22.5 vs 0%), urgent reintervention (16% vs 0%), repeat revascularization events (12.2% vs 3.7%), progression of native disease (4.8% vs 0.9%), rehospitalization by 3 months (20% vs 2%) and postoperative infarction (2.9% vs 1.45%). These risks did not translate to an increase in early mortality (0-1% vs 0-1.6%) or late mortality (0-3% vs 0-14%) in papers that included mid-term follow up. However, they do represent significant potential risks that cannot be overlooked when considering the use of MIDCAB. We conclude that MIDCAB is associated with greater morbidity and reintervention compared to OPCAB via sternotomy, but both techniques are equivalent in terms of operative and mid-term mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 364
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary surgery through sternotomy
    Birla, R.
    Patel, P.
    Aresu, G.
    Asimakopoulos, G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2013, 95 (07) : 481 - 485
  • [2] Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques -: minithoracotomy or sternotomy?
    Detter, C
    Reichenspurner, H
    Boehm, DH
    Thalhammer, M
    Schütz, A
    Reichart, B
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 19 (04) : 464 - 470
  • [3] Dunning Joel, 2003, Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, V2, P405, DOI 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9
  • [4] Beating heart coronary artery surgery: is sternotomy a suitable alternative to minimal invasive technique?
    Gersbach, P
    Imsand, C
    von Segesser, LK
    Delabays, A
    Vogt, P
    Stumpe, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 20 (04) : 760 - 764
  • [5] Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Halkos, Michael E.
    Vassiliades, Thomas A.
    Douglas, John S.
    Morris, Douglas C.
    Rab, S. Tanveer
    Liberman, Henry A.
    Samady, Habib
    Kilgo, Patrick D.
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Puskas, John D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (05) : 1695 - 1701
  • [6] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass in Single-Vessel Disease
    Karpuzoglu, Osman Eren
    Ozay, Batuhan
    Sener, Tufan
    Aydin, Naz Bige
    Ketenci, Bulent
    Aksu, Timucin
    Gercekoglu, Hakan
    Demirtas, Murat
    [J]. HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2009, 12 (01) : E39 - E43
  • [7] Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study
    Lapierre, Harry
    Chan, Vincent
    Sohmer, Benjamin
    Mesana, Thierry G.
    Ruel, Marc
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (04) : 804 - 810
  • [8] An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: The Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial
    Rogers, Chris A.
    Pike, Katie
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    Reeves, Barnaby C.
    Glauber, Mattia
    Ferrarini, Matteo
    Murphy, Gavin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 146 (02) : 306 - +
  • [9] Results of the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting angiographic patency study
    Ruel, Marc
    Shariff, Masood A.
    Lapierre, Harry
    Goyal, Nikhil
    Dennie, Carole
    Sadel, Scott M.
    Sohmer, Benjamin
    McGinn, Joseph T., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (01) : 203 - 209
  • [10] Technical adjuncts in beating heart surgery - Comparison of MIDCAB to off-pump sternotomy: a meta-analysis
    Stanbridge, RDL
    Hadjinikolaou, LK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 16 : S24 - S33