High frequency of contact allergy to gold in patients with endovascular coronary stents

被引:28
作者
Ekqvist, S. [1 ]
Svedman, C.
Moeller, H.
Kehler, M.
Pripp, C. M.
Bjoerk, J.
Gruvberger, B.
Holmstroem, E.
Gustavsson, C. G.
Bruze, M.
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Dermatol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Blekinge Hosp, Dept Thorac Intervent, Karlskrona, Sweden
[4] Univ Lund Hosp, Competence Ctr Clin Res, Lund, Sweden
[5] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
contact allergy; gold; nickel; stent;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08119.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Stent implantation is an effective method for treatment of atherosclerotic disease. Factors predisposing to in-stent restenosis are still largely unknown. Contact allergy to metal ions eluted from the stent has been suggested to be a risk factor. Objectives To explore whether there is a possible induction of contact allergy to metals used in stents among patients with a stainless steel stent containing nickel (Ni stent) and patients with a gold-plated stent (Au stent). Methods Adults (n = 484) treated with coronary stent implantation participated in the study with patch testing. The study design was retrospective and cross-sectional with no assessment of contact allergy before stenting. Age- and sex-matched patch-tested patients with dermatitis (n = 447) served as controls. Results Of Au-stented patients, 54 of 146 (37%) were allergic to gold compared with 85 of 447 (19%) controls (P < 0.001). Within the stented population there were no statistically significant differences in contact allergy to gold or nickel between Ni-stented and Au-stented patients. In multivariate models where other risk factors for contact allergy to gold were considered, the Au stent showed a trend towards statistical significance (odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.95-2.16; P = 0.09). Conclusions As the frequency of contact allergy to gold is higher in stented patients independent of stent type it suggests a previous sensitization. However, several pieces of circumstantial evidence as well as statistical analysis indicate the possibility of sensitization in the coronary vessel by the Au stent. Ni stents and Au stents should not be ruled out as risk factors for induction of contact allergy to these metals.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 738
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Contact allergy to gold is correlated to dental gold
    Ahlgren, C
    Ahnlide, I
    Björkner, B
    Bruze, M
    Liedholm, R
    Möller, H
    Nilner, K
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2002, 82 (01) : 41 - 44
  • [2] Gold concentration in blood in relation to the number of gold restorations and contact allergy to gold
    Ahnlide, I
    Ahlgren, C
    Björkner, B
    Bruze, M
    Lundh, T
    Möller, H
    Nilner, K
    Schütz, A
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 60 (05) : 301 - 305
  • [3] *ASTM, 2003, F13803 ASTM
  • [4] Beck J D, 1998, Ann Periodontol, V3, P127, DOI 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.127
  • [5] HIGH-FREQUENCY OF CONTACT ALLERGY TO GOLD SODIUM THIOSULFATE - AN INDICATION OF GOLD ALLERGY
    BJORKNER, B
    BRUZE, M
    MOLLER, H
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1994, 30 (03) : 144 - 151
  • [6] Mapping of vascular dendritic cells in atherosclerotic arteries suggests their involvement in local immune-inflammatory reactions
    Bobryshev, YV
    Lord, RSA
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 1998, 37 (03) : 799 - 810
  • [7] SENSITIZING POTENTIAL OF BERYLLIUM, COPPER AND MOLYBDENUM COMPOUNDS STUDIED BY THE GUINEA-PIG MAXIMIZATION METHOD
    BOMAN, A
    WAHLBERG, JE
    HAGELTHORN, G
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1979, 5 (05) : 332 - 333
  • [8] Brasch J, 2001, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V81, P122
  • [9] Recommendation to include methyldibromo glutaronitrile in the European standard patch test series
    Bruze, M
    Goossens, A
    Gruvberger, B
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [10] Gold - a controversial sensitizer
    Bruze, M
    Andersen, KE
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 40 (06) : 295 - 299