Assessing the validity of inertial measurement units for shoulder kinematics using a commercial sensor-software system: A validation study

被引:14
|
作者
Henschke, Jakob [1 ]
Kaplick, Hannes [1 ]
Wochatz, Monique [1 ]
Engel, Tilman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Univ Outpatient Clin, Dept Sports Med & Sports Orthoped, Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany
关键词
diagnostic techniques and procedures; kinematics; shoulder joint; validation study; wearable devices; UPPER-LIMB; ELBOW INJURIES; MOTION CAPTURE; RANGE; RELIABILITY; TRACKING; MOBILITY; RISK; REHABILITATION; DEFICITS;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.772
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and Aims Wearable inertial sensors may offer additional kinematic parameters of the shoulder compared to traditional instruments such as goniometers when elaborate and time-consuming data processing procedures are undertaken. However, in clinical practice simple-real time motion analysis is required to improve clinical reasoning. Therefore, the aim was to assess the criterion validity between a portable "off-the-shelf" sensor-software system (IMU) and optical motion (Mocap) for measuring kinematic parameters during active shoulder movements. Methods 24 healthy participants (9 female, 15 male, age 29 +/- 4 years, height 177 +/- 11 cm, weight 73 +/- 14 kg) were included. Range of motion (ROM), total range of motion (TROM), peak and mean angular velocity of both systems were assessed during simple (abduction/adduction, horizontal flexion/horizontal extension, vertical flexion/extension, and external/internal rotation) and complex shoulder movements. Criterion validity was determined using intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICC), root mean square error (RMSE) and Bland and Altmann analysis (bias; upper and lower limits of agreement). Results ROM and TROM analysis revealed inconsistent validity during simple (ICC: 0.040-0.733, RMSE: 9.7 degrees-20.3 degrees, bias: 1.2 degrees-50.7 degrees) and insufficient agreement during complex shoulder movements (ICC: 0.104-0.453, RMSE: 10.1 degrees-23.3 degrees, bias: 1.0 degrees-55.9 degrees). Peak angular velocity (ICC: 0.202-0.865, RMSE: 14.6 degrees/s-26.7 degrees/s, bias: 10.2 degrees/s-29.9 degrees/s) and mean angular velocity (ICC: 0.019-0.786, RMSE:6.1 degrees/s-34.2 degrees/s, bias: 1.6 degrees/s-27.8 degrees/s) were inconsistent. Conclusions The "off-the-shelf" sensor-software system showed overall insufficient agreement with the gold standard. Further development of commercial IMU-software-solutions may increase measurement accuracy and permit their integration into everyday clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [2] Feasibility of Shoulder Kinematics Assessment Using Magnetic Inertial Measurement Units in Hemiplegic Patients after Stroke: A Pilot Study
    Longhi, Maria
    Donati, Danilo
    Mantovani, Monica
    Casarotti, Silvia
    Calbucci, Lucia
    Puglisi, Giulia
    Platano, Daniela
    Benedetti, Maria Grazia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (21):
  • [3] Similarity of shoulder kinematics between people with subacromial pain syndrome and asymptomatic individuals: A study using inertial measurement units
    Beaud, Adrien
    Lejeune, Quentin
    Pillet, Helene
    Mazarguil, Antoine
    Bertheau, Josette
    Lefevre-Colau, Marie-Martine
    Roren, Alexandra
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2025, 123
  • [4] A Study on Estimation of Planar Gait Kinematics using Minimal Inertial Measurement Units And Inverse Kinematics
    Hu, Xinyao
    Soh, Gim Song
    2014 36TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2014, : 6911 - 6914
  • [5] Concurrent Validity Of Inertial Measurement Units With 3D Motion Analysis System For Joint Kinematics
    Balardi, Kathryn
    Johnson, Michael
    Ross, Jaclyn
    Chinworth, Susan
    Vallabhajosula, Srikant
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2021, 53 (08): : 130 - 131
  • [6] Studying mate choice using inertial measurement units: a validation study with treefrogs
    Gupta, Saumya
    Bee, Mark A.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 202 : 111 - 120
  • [7] Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Inertial Measurement Units to Measure Three-Dimensional Spine and Hip Kinematics During Clinical Movement Tasks
    Bailes, Anna H.
    Johnson, Marit
    Roos, Rachel
    Clark, William
    Cook, Harold
    McKernan, Gina
    Sowa, Gwendolyn A.
    Cham, Rakie
    Bell, Kevin M.
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (20)
  • [8] Validity and Consistency of Concurrent Extraction of Gait Features Using Inertial Measurement Units and Motion Capture System
    Anwary, Arif Reza
    Yu, Hongnian
    Callaway, Andrew
    Vassallo, Michael
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (02) : 1625 - 1634
  • [9] A Localization System Using Inertial Measurement Units from Wireless Commercial Hand-held Devices
    Mikov, Aleksandr
    Moschevikin, Alex
    Fedorov, Alexander
    Sikora, Axel
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDOOR POSITIONING AND INDOOR NAVIGATION (IPIN), 2013,
  • [10] Joint Gait Kinematic and Kinetic Analysis using Inertial Measurement Units and Plantar Pressure Sensor System
    Dela Cruz, Michaela Anne A.
    Legaspi, Katrina Mae C.
    Marcelino, Raymund Miguel D.
    Rosete, Jan Ryan
    Sangalang, Danielle Anne R.
    Suarez, Consuelo G.
    Roxas, Edison A.
    Serrano, Kanny Krizzy D.
    dela Cruz, Angelo R.
    2019 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID, NANOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL, ENVIRONMENT, AND MANAGEMENT (HNICEM), 2019,