The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine

被引:24
作者
Cook, RB [1 ]
Collins, D
Tucker, J
Zioupos, P
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Dept Mat & Med Sci, Postgrad Med Sch, Shrivenham SN6 8LA, England
[2] Great Western Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Swindon, Wilts, England
[3] Great Western Hosp, Dept Radiol, Swindon, Wilts, England
关键词
osteoporosis; screening; specificity; sensitivity; DXA; ultrasound scanners;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.02.003
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This study aims to assess the sensitivity and specificity of two commercially available quantitative ultrasound (QUS) scanners (CUBA Clinical (TM), Sunlight Omnisense (TM)), to differentiate patients with osteoporosis (OP) or osteopenia at the spine and hip confirmed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to investigate the optimum cut-off values to maximize the effectiveness of the screening technique. Participants (n = 268) received DXA scans on their lumbar spine (L1-L4) and hip, with paired QUS scans on their distal radius, proximal phalanx, midshaft tibia and calcaneus. Scanners were evaluated by using receiver-operating characteristics curves and their area under the curve (AUC) values. Measurement of the calcaneus by the CUBA Clinical (TM) showed a superior ability to predict DXA, with AUC values between 0.75 to 0.83 in comparison with AUC values of 0.60 to 0.70 for the Sunlight Omnisense (TM). Cut-off values varied according to the technique used and the accuracy of the screening required. Assessment of the calcaneus was the best QUS technique for the prediction of low bone density at the axial skeleton as diagnosed by DXA. (c) 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 632
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Utility of heel ultrasound bone density in men [J].
Adler, RR ;
Funkhouser, HL ;
Holt, CM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (03) :225-230
[2]  
Biggerstaff BJ, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P649, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000315)19:5&lt
[3]  
649::AID-SIM371&gt
[4]  
3.0.CO
[5]  
2-H
[6]  
Bossuyt PM, 2003, CLIN BIOCHEM, V36, P2
[7]   ULTRASOUND AND DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENT OF THE CALCANEUS - INFLUENCE OF REGION OF INTEREST LOCATION [J].
BROOKEWAVELL, K ;
JONES, PRM ;
PYE, DW .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 57 (01) :20-24
[8]   Influence of region of interest and bone size on calcaneal BMD: implications for the accuracy of quantitative ultrasound assessments at the calcaneus [J].
Cheng, S ;
Njeh, CF ;
Fan, B ;
Cheng, X ;
Hans, D ;
Wang, L ;
Fuerst, T ;
Genant, HK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (889) :59-68
[9]  
COOK RB, 2003, YROK I PHYS ENG MED, P94
[10]   Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment? [J].
Damilakis, J ;
Papadokostakis, G ;
Perisinakis, K ;
Hadjipavlou, A ;
Gourtsoyiannis, N .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 (08) :688-693