Phonological predictors of nonword repetition performance in bilingual children

被引:2
作者
Irizarry-Perez, Carlos D. [1 ]
Pena, Elizabeth D. [2 ]
Bedore, Lisa M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, 1700 Lomas Blvd NE,Suite 1300, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Educ, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Temple Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
WORKING-MEMORY; LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT; SPANISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106156
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Previous research (Gibson et al., 2015; Summers, Bohman, Gillam, Pen tilde a & Bedore, 2010) has suggested an advantage in Spanish over English on nonword repetition tasks with Spanish-English bilingual children. However, comparing nonwords of equal syllable lengths across languages may not sufficiently account for phonological differences across languages. We compared Spanish-language nonword sets of different lengths to select a set that would be equivalent with respect to difficulty in English. We considered language-specific phonological structure and level of difficulty in evaluating nonword performance in 126 first-and second-grade, Spanish-English bilingual children. We predicted that adding 5-syllable words to the Spanish nonword set and monosyllabic words to the English set would result in comparable difficulty. Method: Participants repeated nonwords of increasing lengths in English of 1, 2, 3, and 4 syllables and in Spanish of 2, 3, 4, and 5 syllables. Percent phonemes correct was calculated for total sounds. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare accuracy across word lengths. Results: Results indicated significant differences in overall means between languages when nonwords of equal word lengths were compared, but no significant differences in overall means when lengths of 1 - 4 syllables in English and 2 - 5 syllables in Spanish were used. Differences between languages varied at individual levels of complexity. Conclusions: The finding that level of word length affects performance may have implications for understanding the factors in clinical test development for bilingual children. Further research may benefit from assessing additional language variables and additional language combinations to extend findings.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   PHONOLOGICAL WORKING-MEMORY AND SPEECH PRODUCTION IN PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN [J].
ADAMS, AM ;
GATHERCOLE, SE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 38 (02) :403-414
[2]  
ALAMEDA JoseRamon., 1995, DICCIONARIO FRECUENC
[3]   Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests [J].
Archibald, Lisa M. D. ;
Gathercole, Susan E. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (05) :970-983
[4]   Working memory and language learning: A review [J].
Archibald, Lisa M. D. .
CHILD LANGUAGE TEACHING & THERAPY, 2017, 33 (01) :5-17
[5]   Impairment in non-word repetition: a marker for language impairment or reading impairment? [J].
Baird, Gillian ;
Slonims, Vicky ;
Simonoff, Emily ;
Dworzynski, Katharina .
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2011, 53 (08) :711-716
[6]   A Quasi-Universal Nonword Repetition Task as a Diagnostic Tool for Bilingual Children Learning Dutch as a Second Language [J].
Boerma, Tessel ;
Chiat, Shula ;
Leseman, Paul ;
Timmermeister, Mona ;
Wijnen, Frank ;
Blom, Elma .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (06) :1747-1760
[7]  
Calderon J., 2003, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[8]   Young children's sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon [J].
Coady, JA ;
Aslin, RN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (03) :183-213
[9]   Nonword repetition and child language impairment [J].
Dollaghan, C ;
Campbell, TF .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (05) :1136-1146
[10]   Early-, Middle-, and Late-Developing Sounds in Monolingual and Bilingual Children: An Exploratory Investigation [J].
Fabiano-Smith, Leah ;
Goldstein, Brian A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2010, 19 (01) :66-77