Management of recurrent locoregional breast cancer: oncologist survey

被引:23
作者
Clemons, M
Hamilton, T
Mansi, J
Lockwood, G
Goss, P
机构
[1] Toronto Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Univ London St Georges Hosp, London, England
关键词
locoregional recurrence; breast cancer; management;
D O I
10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00107-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. A questionnaire was used to assess consensus between breast oncologists about the definition, prognosis and management of patients with LRR. The questionnaire was mailed to surgical, radiation and medical oncologists in Canada, the UK and the USA. Of 495 questionnaires, 322 (65%) were returned. Most clinicians sampled agree that disease in the skin of the chest wall, surgical scar, axilla, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), infraclavicular lymph nodes, supraclavicular fossa lymph nodes and internal mammary lymph nodes constitute sites of LRR. The sites that were felt to be curable by the majority of respondents were: IBTR, surgical scar, axilla or chest wall. It was for these disease sites that local therapy was generally recommended. Irrespective of the site of recurrence, most respondents surveyed recommend initiation of a new systemic therapy at the time of LRR. While the results of this survey show general agreement regarding the definition of sites of LRR, treatment recommendations vary among oncologists. Due to the variation in sites of recurrence, time since initial diagnosis and prior therapy, the exact prognosis and optimal management of LRR remain undefined. In the absence of randomized prospective trial data, recommendations for local and systemic therapy of LRR will continue to mimic those offered at the time of initial presentation of breast cancer. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 337
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Does treatment at the time of locoregional failure of breast cancer alter prognosis? [J].
Clemons, M ;
Hamilton, T ;
Goss, P .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2001, 27 (02) :83-97
[12]   Identifying breast cancer patients at high risk for bone metastases [J].
Colleoni, M ;
O'Neill, A ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Gelber, RD ;
Bonetti, M ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Price, KN ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Coates, AS ;
Lindtner, J ;
Collins, J ;
Senn, HJ ;
Cavalli, F ;
Forbes, J ;
Gudgeon, A ;
Simoncini, E ;
Cortes-Funes, H ;
Veronesi, A ;
Fey, M ;
Rudenstam, CM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (23) :3925-3935
[13]  
DAHLSTROM KK, 1993, CANCER, V72, P774, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3<774::AID-CNCR2820720323>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-Y
[15]  
DAO TL, 1963, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V117, P447
[16]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[17]  
DONEGAN WL, 1977, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V39, P533, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<533::AID-CNCR2820390222>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-V
[19]   BREAST RECURRENCE FOLLOWING CONSERVATIVE SURGERY AND RADIATION - PATTERNS OF FAILURE, PROGNOSIS, AND PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS FROM MASTECTOMY SPECIMENS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT [J].
FOWBLE, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
SCHULTZ, DJ ;
RUBENSTEIN, J ;
GOODMAN, RL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (04) :833-842
[20]  
GAGE I, 1983, ANN SURG, V197, P284