Effect of organic loading rate on a wastewater treatment process combining moving bed biofilm and membrane reactors

被引:36
作者
Melin, E [1 ]
Leiknes, T
Helness, H
Rasmussen, V
Odegaard, H
机构
[1] SINTEF Civil & Environm Engn, Dept Water & Wastewater, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Water & Environm Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Kaldnes Miljoteknologi AS, N-3103 Tonsberg, Norway
关键词
membrane reactor; moving bed biofilm reactor; particle size distribution; wastewater treatment;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2005.0664
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) loading rate on membrane fouling rate was studied in two parallel units combining MBBR and membrane reactor. Hollow fiber membranes with molecular weight cut-off of 30 kD were used. The HRTs of the MBBRs varied from 45 min to 4 h and the COD loading rates ranged from 4.1 to 26.6 g COD m(-2) d(-1). The trans-membrane pressure (TMP) was very sensitive to fluxes for the used membranes and the experiments were carried out at relatively low fluxes (3.3-5.6 lm(-2) h(-1)). Beside the test with the highest flux, there were no consistent differences in fouling rate between the low- and high-rate reactors. Also, the removal efficiencies were quite similar in both systems. The average COD removal efficiencies in the total process were 87% at 3-4 h HRT and 83% at 0.75- 1 h HRT. At high loading rates, there was a shift in particle size distribution towards smaller particles in the MBBR effluents. However, 79-81% of the COD was in particles that were separated by membranes, explaining the relatively small differences in the removal efficiencies at different loading rates. The COD fractionation also indicated that the choice of membrane pore size within the range of 30 kD to 0.1 mu m has very small effect on the COD removal in the MBBR/membrane process, especially with low-rate MBBRs.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 430
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors [J].
Bouhabila, E ;
Ben Aïm, R ;
Buisson, H .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 22-3 (1-3) :123-132
[2]   Impact of soluble organic compounds on permeate flux in an aerobic membrane bioreactor [J].
Cicek, N ;
Suidan, MT ;
Ginestet, P ;
Audic, JM .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 24 (02) :249-256
[3]   Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling [J].
Defrance, L ;
Jaffrin, MY ;
Gupta, B ;
Paullier, P ;
Geaugey, V .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 73 (02) :105-112
[4]  
HELNESS H, 2002, STF66FO2134 SINTEF
[5]   A NEW MOVING-BED BIOFILM REACTOR - APPLICATIONS AND RESULTS [J].
ODEGAARD, H ;
RUSTEN, B ;
WESTRUM, T .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (10-11) :157-165
[6]  
Odegaard H, 2000, CHEMICAL WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT VI, P245
[7]  
VANDERROEST HF, 2002, MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS
[8]   Critical particle size in membrane bioreactors - Case of a denitrifying bacterial suspension [J].
Wisniewski, C ;
Grasmick, A ;
Cruz, AL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 178 (1-2) :141-150
[9]   Flee size distribution in a membrane bioreactor and consequences for membrane fouling [J].
Wisniewski, C ;
Grasmick, A .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1998, 138 (2-3) :403-411