2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Topical Adhesive as an Alternative to Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Same Patient

被引:20
作者
Choi, Keun Young [1 ]
Koh, In Jun [2 ]
Kim, Man Soo [1 ]
Park, Dong Chul [1 ]
Sung, Yong Gyu [1 ]
In, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul St Marys Hosp, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Eunpyeong St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; 2-octyl cyanoacrylate topical adhesive; polyester mesh; subcuticular suture; dermabond prineo;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The 2-octyl cyanoacrylate topical adhesive with flexible self-adhesive polyester mesh (Dermabond Prineo) is becoming widely used in many surgical fields. However, no prior studies have tested the efficacy and safety of this topical adhesive compared with subcuticular suture in the same patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between Dermabond Prineo and subcuticular suture for skin closure in patients undergoing same-day bilateral total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Materials and Methods: A prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed in 51 patients scheduled to undergo same-day bilateral TKAs. One knee was randomly assigned to the Dermabond Prineo and the other knee was allocated to the subcuticular suture. As primary outcomes, Vancouver scar scale was evaluated at 6 months and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included cosmesis efficacy (Hollander wound evaluation scale [HWES] and cosmesis visual analog scale [VAS]), time and pain efficiency (skin suture time, stitch out time, and stitch out pain VAS), and safety (wound complications during the 6-month follow-up period). The primary and secondary outcome measures were compared between groups. Results: There were no significant differences in Vancouver scar scale and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale at 6 months. Although there were no significant differences in HWES at 2 weeks, the Dermabond Prineo group showed better step-off border item of HWES. There was also no difference in cosmesis VAS at 6 months. The Dermabond Prineo group showed superior results in terms of time (suture time: Dermabond Prineo = 191 second (sec) +/- 60.1 sec, subcuticular suture = 356.8 sec +/- 92.3 sec; stitch out time: Dermabond Prineo = 4 sec +/- 1.3 sec, subcuticular suture = 26.6 sec +/- 4.2 sec, all P <.001) without significant differences in pain scale (P =.823) or wound complications (all P >.05). Conclusion: Comparing cosmetic efficacy, time efficiency, and safety, Dermabond Prineo provided quicker wound closure, shorter stitch out time, and better wound margin coaptation in the early postoperative period but similar cosmetic efficacy compared with subcuticular suture. Based on our study, Dermabond Prineo is a useful alternative to subcuticular suture in patients undergoing TKA. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3141 / 3147
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Baryza Mary Jo, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P535, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013
[2]   The patient and observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tuinebreijer, WE ;
Middelkoop, E ;
Kreis, RW ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (07) :1960-1965
[3]   A Comparison of Wound Closure Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Eggers, Mitchell D. ;
Fang, Li ;
Lionberger, David R. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (08) :1251-1258
[4]  
Freitas Junior R, 2019, REV COL BRAS CIR, V46
[5]   WOUND REGISTRY - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
HOLLANDER, JE ;
SINGER, AJ ;
VALENTINE, S ;
HENRY, MC .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (05) :675-685
[6]   Use of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesive and Polyester Mesh for Wound Closure in Primary Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Holte, Andrew J. ;
Tofte, Josef N. ;
Dahlberg, Greta J. ;
Noiseux, Nicolas .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (05) :E784-E787
[7]   Trends in Use of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Korea From 2001 to 2010 [J].
Koh, In Jun ;
Kim, Tae Kyun ;
Chang, Chong Bum ;
Cho, Hyung Joon ;
In, Yong .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (05) :1441-1450
[8]   A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research [J].
Koo, Terry K. ;
Li, Mae Y. .
JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 15 (02) :155-163
[9]   Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty? [J].
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund C. ;
Ong, Kevin L. ;
Adler, Edward M. ;
Kolisek, Frank R. ;
Manley, Michael T. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (12) :2926-2937
[10]   n-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Histoacryl) vs. subcuticular sutures for skin closure of Pfannenstiel incisions following cesarean delivery [J].
Kwon, Ji Young ;
Yun, Hang Goo ;
Park, In Yang .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09)