Validation and diagnostic efficacy of a lipase assay using the substrate 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6′methyl resorufin)-ester for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in dogs

被引:40
作者
Graca, R [1 ]
Messick, J
McCullough, S
Barger, A
Hoffmann, W
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Vet Pathobiol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Vet Diagnost Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Vet Clin Med, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
dog; lipase; method validation; pancreatitis; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1939-165X.2005.tb00007.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background: Increased serum lipase activity has been used historically to support the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, a common disease in dogs. Most of the lipase assays that are currently in use lack optimum sensitivity and specificity. Objective: The objectives of this study were to 1) validate the 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero-3-glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) assay for determination of lipase activity in canine serum and 2) compare results, reference intervals, sensitivity, and specificity of the DGGR assay with a standard 1,2-diglyceride (1,2 DiG) assay for diagnosing acute pancreatitis in dogs. Methods: Precision, linearity, and interference studies were performed for method validation on a Hitachi 911 analyzer. Lipase results from the DGGR and 1,2 DiG assays were compared by linear regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficacy were determined for both assays on a population of 30 dogs, 15 of which had acute pancreatitis based on history, clinical signs, and ultrasound findings. Results: Within-run and within-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were low (< 3%), with higher day-to-day CVs (<= 14 %). The assay was linear between 8 and 2792 U/L. No significant interference by hemolysis and lipemia was found. Poor correlation was found between the assays (r(s) = 0.84). The lipase reference interval was 8-120 U/L for the DGGR assay and 30-699 U/L for the 1,2 DiG assay. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatitis were 93% and 53%, respectively, for the DGGR assay and 60% and 73% for the 1,2 DiG assay. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed similar areas under the curve. Conclusions: On the basis of this study, the DGGR method is considered adequate for assaying serum lipase activity in dogs. The high sensitivity of the DGGR assay suggests it may be a useful screening test for canine pancreatitis. (c) 2005 American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 43
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Evaluation of three pancreas specific protein assays, TLI (trypsin-like immunoreactivity), PASP (pancreas specific protein) and CA 19-9 (glycoprotein) for use in the diagnosis of canine pancreatitis [J].
Archer, FJ ;
Kerr, ME ;
Houston, DM .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES A-PHYSIOLOGY PATHOLOGY CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (02) :109-113
[2]  
BUNCH SE, 1998, SMALL ANIMAL INTERNA, P555
[3]  
Gerhardt A, 2001, J VET INTERN MED, V15, P329, DOI 10.1892/0891-6640(2001)015&lt
[4]  
0329:COTSOD&gt
[5]  
2.3.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
GLOVSKY J, 2004, LIPASE REAGENTS EQUA
[8]  
Hess RS, 1998, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V213, P665
[9]  
Mackenzie AL, 1996, CAN J VET RES, V60, P205
[10]  
Mansfield C. S., 2000, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, V14, P346