Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty surgery: A comparison of revision and primary total hip arthroplasty

被引:28
作者
Walker, WC
Keyser-Marcus, LA
Cifu, DX
Chaudhri, M
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Rehabil Hosp Virginia, HealthSouth, Richmond, VA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2001年 / 82卷 / 01期
关键词
arthroplasty; replacement; hip; health care costs; reoperation; rehabilitation; treatment outcome;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2001.18604
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To describe outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients who underwent interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation, and to compare them with primary THA patients. Design: Descriptive and case-control study. Setting: Forty-bed, community-based, freestanding rehabilitation hospital. Patients: Thirty-nine revision THA subjects, gender- and age-matched with 39 primary THA controls. Intervention: Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation. Main Outcome Measures: FIM(TM) instrument, length of stay, hospital charges, and disposition location. Results: The average revision THA patient stayed 10.5 days, improved from an admission FIM score of 89 to a discharge FIM score of 110, and incurred a hospital charge of $10,600. Of the revision THA patients, 98% were discharged home, and orthopedic-related complications were uncommon. No significant differences existed between revision and primary THA patients in any outcome measures. A trend toward higher rehabilitation charges ($12,400 vs $9500, p =.07) was found in revision THA patients who wore a hip orthosis. Otherwise, no differences were found in outcome measures based on the type of revision surgery, the presence of weight-bearing restrictions, or the presence of orthopedic complications. Conclusions: THA patients selected for inpatient rehabilitation have favorable short-term functional outcomes. The type of THA (primary vs revision) is not an independent differentiating factor.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 133
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty [J].
Berger, RA ;
Quigley, LR ;
Jacobs, JJ ;
Sheinkop, MB ;
Rosenberg, AG ;
Galante, JO .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (12) :1682-1691
[2]   Factors affecting length of stay and need for rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty [J].
Forrest, G ;
Fuchs, M ;
Gutierrez, A ;
Girardy, J .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (02) :186-190
[3]   Decreasing length of stay after total joint arthroplasty: Effect on referrals to rehabilitation units [J].
Forrest, GP ;
Roque, JM ;
Dawodu, ST .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (02) :192-194
[4]  
Hamilton B., 1987, Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement, V1st
[5]   TOTAL HIP AND TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT .1. [J].
HARRIS, WH ;
SLEDGE, CB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (11) :725-731
[6]   Incidence of dislocation following hip arthroplasty for patients in the rehabilitation setting [J].
Krotenberg, R ;
Stitik, T ;
Johnston, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1995, 74 (06) :444-447
[7]  
LAVERNIA CJ, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P136
[8]   Revision total hip arthroplasty - Indications and outcomes [J].
Mahomed, N ;
Katz, JN .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1996, 39 (12) :1939-1950
[9]  
Maloney WJ, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P157
[10]   Isolated revision acetabuloplasty using a porous-coated cementless acetabular component without removal of a well-fixed femoral component - A 3- to 9-year follow-up study [J].
Moskal, JT ;
Danisa, OA ;
Shaffrey, CI .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (07) :719-727