Is sustainability knowledge half the battle? An examination of sustainability knowledge, attitudes, norms, and efficacy to understand sustainable behaviours

被引:85
作者
Heeren, Alexander John [1 ]
Singh, Ajay S. [1 ]
Zwickle, Adam [2 ]
Koontz, Tomas M. [3 ]
Slagle, Kristina M. [1 ]
McCreery, Anna C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Sch Criminal Justice, Environm Sci & Policy Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Interdisciplinary Arts & Sci, Tacoma, WA USA
[4] Elevate Energy, Dept Res, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Sustainability; Knowledge; Attitudes; Perceived behavioural control; Theory of planned behaviour; Knowledge deficit model; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; RISK INFORMATION-SEEKING; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; SCIENCE; ENERGY; MODEL; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTIONS; DEFICIT; AGENDA;
D O I
10.1108/IJSHE-02-2015-0014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of sustainability knowledge to pro-environmental behaviour. A common misperception is that unsustainable behaviours are largely driven by a lack of knowledge of the underlying societal costs and the contributing factors leading to environmental degradation. Such a perception assumes if individuals "only knew better" they would engage in more sustainable behaviours. The "knowledge deficit model" has been critiqued for not including social psychological research about how knowledge is incorporated into decision-making and its subsequent effect on human behaviour. The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model has been used extensively to examine intention to engage in a variety of behaviours, therefore this model is applied to examine the effect knowledge has in predicting behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - To better understand these relationships, the authors examined the relationships between sustainability behaviours through an online survey of over 500 students at a large university in the USA. Findings - Results indicate that knowledge had a significant, albeit weak, bivariate correlation with behaviour (r = 0.113, p = 0.001). However, when controlling for TPB variables (attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control), knowledge was not a significant predictor of behaviour. Research limitations/implications - The authors conclude with several implications to guide university sustainability programmes. Originality/value - This study places sustainable knowledge in the context of other social psychological factors which also influence behaviour. The results show that as the students are educated about sustainability, fostering behaviour change will require education not only about how actions affect sustainability but also about social norms, attitudes towards sustainable behaviours and the level of self-efficacy in doing those behaviours.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 632
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条