Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values

被引:92
作者
Escobar, A. [1 ]
Gonzalez, M. [1 ]
Quintana, J. M. [2 ]
Vrotsou, K. [1 ]
Bilbao, A. [3 ]
Herrera-Espineira, C. [4 ]
Garcia-Perez, L. [5 ]
Aizpuru, F. [6 ]
Sarasqueta, C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Basurto, Unidad Invest, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Bilbao 48013, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] Hosp Galdakao, Unidad Invest, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
[3] Fdn Vasca Innovac & Invest Sanitarias BIOEF, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Sondika, Bizkaia, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
[5] Canary Isl Hlth Serv, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
[6] Hosp Txagorritxu, Unidad Invest, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Vitoria, Spain
[7] Hosp Donostia, Unidad Invest, CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
关键词
Joint replacement; Response criteria; Outcomes assessment; Satisfaction; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICALLY-IMPORTANT-IMPROVEMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; IMPORTANT-DIFFERENCE; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEALTH; HIP; TRIAL; ARTHROPLASTY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2011.11.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To identify new cut-off values beyond which patients can be considered as satisfied or as responders through patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International) set of responder criteria in total joint replacement. Methods: Secondary analysis of a 1-year prospective multicenter study of 861 patients, 510 with total knee replacement (TKR) and 351 with total hip prosthesis (THR). Pain and function data were collected by the reverse scoring option of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). PASS values were identified with the 25th centile estimation using an anchoring question about satisfaction with actual symptoms. OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria was based on a combination of absolute and relative change of pain, function and global patient's assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used as a complementary approach. Results: The values for PASS were about 80 and 69 for pain and function in THR, while these values were 80 and 68 when using OMERACT-OARSI criteria. Regarding TKR, PASS values were about 75 and 67 in pain and function with both criteria. ROC values were slightly lower in all cases. PASS and OMERACT-OARSI values varied moderately across tertiles of baseline severity. Conclusion: With the provided data we can establish when a patient can be considered as satisfied/responder in joint replacement. The scores achieved at 1 year were very similar according to both criteria. (C) 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement?
    Arden, N. K.
    Kiran, A.
    Judge, A.
    Biant, L. C.
    Javaid, M. K.
    Murray, D. W.
    Carr, A. J.
    Cooper, C.
    Field, R. E.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [2] A treatment applying a biomechanical device to the feet of patients with knee osteoarthritis results in reduced pain and improved function: a prospective controlled study
    Bar-Ziv, Yaron
    Beer, Yiftah
    Ran, Yuval
    Benedict, Shaike
    Halperin, Nahum
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
  • [3] Batlle-Gualda Enrique, 1999, Revista Espanola de Reumatologia, V26, P38
  • [4] BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
  • [5] Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?
    Bourne, Robert B.
    Chesworth, Bert M.
    Davis, Aileen M.
    Mahomed, Nizar N.
    Charron, Kory D. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [6] Comparing Patient Outcomes After THA and TKA Is There a Difference?
    Bourne, Robert B.
    Chesworth, Bert
    Davis, Aileen
    Mahomed, Nizar
    Charron, Kory
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (02) : 542 - 546
  • [7] Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery
    Chesworth, Bert M.
    Mahomed, Nizar N.
    Bourne, Robert B.
    Davis, Aileen M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (09) : 907 - 918
  • [8] Evaluation of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State in a pooled analysis of two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating lumiracoxib and celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis
    Dougados, Maxime
    Moore, Alan
    Yu, Shaohua
    Gitton, Xavier
    [J]. ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2007, 9 (01)
  • [9] Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis
    Escobar, A
    Quintana, JM
    Bilbao, A
    Azkárate, J
    Güenaga, JI
    [J]. CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 21 (06) : 466 - 471
  • [10] Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty - A qualitative and systematic review of the literature
    Ethgen, O
    Bruyere, O
    Richy, F
    Dardennes, C
    Reginster, JY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (05) : 963 - 974