Prognosis in advanced lung cancer - A prospective study examining key clinicopathological factors

被引:100
作者
Simmons, Claribel P. [1 ]
Koinis, Filippos [2 ]
Fallon, Marie T. [1 ]
Fearon, Kenneth C. [1 ]
Bowden, Jo [1 ]
Solheim, Tora S. [3 ]
Gronberg, Bjorn Henning [3 ,4 ]
McMillan, Donald C. [5 ]
Gioulbasanis, Ioannis [6 ]
Laird, Barry J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Canc Res Ctr, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Hosp Herakleion, Oncol, Iraklion, Crete, Greece
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, European Palliat Care Res Ctr, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[4] Univ Trondheim Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Canc Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Univ Glasgow, Dept Surg Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[6] Larisa Gen Clin, Thessaly, Greece
关键词
Inflammation; Prognosis; Cachexia; Performance status; Lung cancer; CRP; PERFORMANCE STATUS; SCORE; CHEMOTHERAPY; ONCOLOGISTS; PREDICTIONS; SURVIVAL; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.03.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: In patients with advanced incurable lung cancer deciding as to the most appropriate treatment (e.g. chemotherapy or supportive care only) is challenging. In such patients the TNM classification system has reached its ceiling therefore other factors are used to assess prognosis and as such, guide treatment. Performance status (PS), weight loss and inflammatory biomarkers (Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)) predict survival in advanced lung cancer however these have not been compared. This study compares key prognostic factors in advanced lung cancer. Materials and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer were recruited and demographics, weight loss, other prognostic factors (mGPS, PS) were collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to compare these prognostic factors. Results: 390 patients with advanced incurable lung cancer were recruited; 341 were male, median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73) and patients had stage IV non-small cell (n = 288) (73.8%) or extensive stage small cell lung cancer (n = 102) (26.2%). The median survival was 7.8 months. On multivariate analysis only performance status (HR 1.74 CI 1.50-2.02) and mGPS (HR 1.67, Cl 1.40-2.00) predicted survival (p < 0.001). Survival at 3 months ranged from 99% (ECOG 0-1) to 74% (ECOG 2) and using mGPS, from 99% (mGPSO) to 71% (mGPS2). In combination, survival ranged from 99% (mGPS 0, ECOG 0-1) to 33% (mGPS2, ECOG 3). Conclusion: Performance status and the mGPS are superior prognostic factors in advanced lung cancer. In combination, these improved survival prediction compared with either alone. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 309
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Sauerbrei, Willi ;
Taube, Sheila E. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (05)
[2]   Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses, and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Ando, M ;
Ando, Y ;
Hasegawa, Y ;
Shimokata, K ;
Minami, H ;
Wakai, K ;
Ohno, Y ;
Sakai, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (11) :1634-1639
[3]  
Anshushaug M, 2014, ACTA ONCOL, P1
[4]   2011 Focused Update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Azzoli, Christopher G. ;
Temin, Sarah ;
Giaccone, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2012, 8 (01) :63-66
[5]   Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree? [J].
Blagden, SP ;
Charman, SC ;
Sharples, LD ;
Magee, LRA ;
Gilligan, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (06) :1022-1027
[6]   How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review [J].
Chow, E ;
Harth, T ;
Hruby, G ;
Finkelstein, J ;
Wu, J ;
Danjoux, C .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 13 (03) :209-218
[7]   Should Patient-Rated Performance Status Affect Treatment Decisions in Advanced Lung Cancer? [J].
Dajczman, Esther ;
Kasymjanova, Goulnar ;
Kreisman, Harvey ;
Swinton, Nelda ;
Pepe, Carmela ;
Small, David .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 3 (10) :1133-1136
[8]   Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus [J].
Fearon, Kenneth ;
Strasser, Florian ;
Anker, Stefan D. ;
Bosaeus, Ingvar ;
Bruera, Eduardo ;
Fainsinger, Robin L. ;
Jatoi, Aminah ;
Loprinzi, Charles ;
MacDonald, Neil ;
Mantovani, Giovanni ;
Davis, Mellar ;
Muscaritoli, Maurizio ;
Ottery, Faith ;
Radbruch, Lukas ;
Ravasco, Paula ;
Walsh, Declan ;
Wilcock, Andrew ;
Kaasa, Stein ;
Baracos, Vickie E. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (05) :489-495
[9]   Non small cell lung cancer patients with ECOG PS2: unsolved questions and lessons from clinical trials [J].
Gebbia, Vittorio ;
Galetta, D. ;
De Marinis, F. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 :123-131
[10]   Nutritional status, acute phase response and depression in metastatic lung cancer patients: correlations and association prognosis [J].
Giannousi, Zoe ;
Gioulbasanis, Ioannis ;
Pallis, Athanasios G. ;
Xyrafas, Alexandros ;
Dalliani, Danai ;
Kalbakis, Kostas ;
Papadopoulos, Vassilis ;
Mavroudis, Dimitris ;
Georgoulias, Vassilis ;
Papandreou, Christos N. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (08) :1823-1829