Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Treprostinil Palmitil Inhalation Powder for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Single- and Multiple-Dose Study

Introduction Treprostinil is a prostacyclin vasodilator widely used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and, in its inhaled form, for pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Treprostinil palmitil inhalation powder (TPIP) is a dry powder formulation of treprostinil palmitil (TP), an ester prodrug of treprostinil. TPIP is designed to provide sustained release of treprostinil in the lung over a prolonged period, potentially enabling a once-daily (QD) dosing regimen and significantly higher tolerated doses compared with currently available treprostinil formulations. This phase 1 study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TP and treprostinil following single and multiple QD administrations of TPIP in healthy volunteers. Methods Healthy adults (aged 18-45 years) were randomized to receive single or multiple QD inhalation doses of TPIP. Participants in the single-dose phase received TPIP 112.5, 225, 450, or 675 mu g (n = 6/dose) or placebo (n = 2). Participants in the multiple-dose phase received TPIP 225 mu g QD for 7 days (n = 6), 112.5 mu g QD for 4 days followed by 225 mu g QD for 3 days (n = 6), or placebo for 7 days (n = 4). Results Overall, 41 of 42 participants (97.6%) completed the study. In the single-dose phase, 70.8% (n = 17/24) of TPIP-treated participants experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) vs 0% (n = 0/2) of placebo-treated participants; the most common TEAEs (>= 20%) were cough (45.8%), dizziness (29.2%), and throat irritation (20.8%). In the multiple-dose phase, 83.3% (n = 10/12) of TPIP-treated participants experienced a TEAE vs 50.0% of placebo-treated participants (n = 2/4); the most common TEAEs were cough (58.3% TPIP vs 50.0% placebo), headache (50.0% vs 0%), nausea (33.3% vs 0%), chest discomfort (33.3% vs 0%), and dizziness (25.0% vs 0%). Most TEAEs were mild; only seven patients experienced a moderate TEAE, and no severe or serious TEAEs occurred. In the multiple-dose phase, participants whose doses were titrated from TPIP 112.5 mu g QD to 225 mu g QD experienced fewer TEAEs than those who received 225 mu g QD at treatment initiation (66.7% vs 100.0%), and all TEAEs with dose titration were mild. After a single dose of TPIP, treprostinil elimination t(1/2) was 8.67-11.6 h and exposure was dose proportional, with mean (CV%) C-max 78.4-717 pg/mL (38.6-72.9%) and AUC(0-infinity) 1090-5480 pg center dot h/mL (11.5-30.0%). At steady state (TPIP 225 mu g), the mean (CV%) of C-max, C-min, and AUC(tau) were 193-228 pg/mL (32.9-46.4%), 17.6-22.8 ng/mL (43.7-64.4%), and 1680-1820 pg center dot h/mL (28.7-36.6%), respectively. The elimination t(1/2) was 6.84-8.82 h after repeat dosing. No steady-state accumulation was observed. Plasma concentrations of TP were below the limit of quantification (100 pg/mL) at all time points measured. Conclusion TPIP was well tolerated at the doses tested, and dose titration improved tolerability. Treprostinil pharmacokinetics were linear and supportive of a QD treatment regimen. These results support further development of TPIP in patients with PAH and PH-ILD.