Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success

被引:330
作者
Serrador, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Pinto, Jeffrey K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Serrador Project Management, Mississauga, ON L5E 3G3, Canada
[2] Humber Coll, Toronto, ON M9W 5L7, Canada
[3] Penn State Erie, Black Sch Business, Erie, PA 16563 USA
关键词
Success; Agile; Methodology; Efficiency; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Agile project management methodology has been widely used in recent years as a means to counter the dangers of traditional, front-end planning methods that often lead to downstream development pathologies. Although numerous authors have pointed to the advantages of Agile, with its emphasis on individuals and interactions over processes, customer collaboration over contracts and formal negotiations, and responsiveness over rigid planning, there are, to date, very few large-scale, empirical studies to support the contention that Agile methods can improve the likelihood of project success. Developed originally for software development, it is still predominantly an IT phenomenon. But due to its success it has now spread to non-IT projects. Using a data sample of 1002 projects across multiple industries and countries, we tested the effect of Agile use in organizations on two dimensions of project success: efficiency and overall stakeholder satisfaction against organizational goals. We further examined the moderating effects of variables such as perceived quality of the vision/goals of the project, project complexity, and project team experience. Our findings suggest that Agile methods do have a positive impact on both dimensions of project success. Further, the quality of the vision/goals is a marginally significant moderator of this effect. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1051
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective [J].
Ahern, Terence ;
Leavy, Brian ;
Byrne, P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (08) :1371-1381
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CHAOS MAN 2011
[3]  
ATKINSON R, 1999, MACWORLD AUG, P17
[4]  
Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
[5]   Get ready for agile methods, with care [J].
Boehm, B .
COMPUTER, 2002, 35 (01) :64-+
[6]  
Budzier A., 2013, IRNOP OSL
[7]   Aim, Fire, Aim-Project Planning Styles in Dynamic Environments [J].
Collyer, Simon ;
Warren, Clive ;
Hemsley, Bronwyn ;
Stevens, Chris .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (04) :108-121
[8]   What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research [J].
Conway, James M. ;
Lance, Charles E. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) :325-334
[9]  
Cooke-Davies T., 2002, Int J Proj Manag, V20, P185, DOI [10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9]
[10]  
Cooper D.R., 2008, Business research methods, V10th