Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium: YAG laser stone fragmentation: The "popcorn effect"

被引:64
作者
Chawla, Sam N. [1 ]
Chang, Mark F. [1 ]
Chang, Andrew [1 ]
Lenoir, James [1 ]
Bagley, Demetrius H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2007.9843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To demonstrate the validity of non-contact holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser stone fragmentation in an in-vitro model and to characterize the optimal laser settings to perform this technique. Materials and Methods: A caliceal model consisting of a glass test tube filled with 0.9% normal saline was created. Into this system, a 365-mu m laser fiber was inserted after stabilization 2 mm above the surface of the stones. Laser experiments were conducted using tubes that contained four soda limestone phantoms with a total stone burden of approximately 0.2 g per tube. The laser energy was varied between 1.0 and 1.5 J, with a firing frequency of 20, 30, or 40 Hz. Ten tubes were tested at each setting combination for a duration of 2 minutes. Thus, 60 tubes were tested. The contents of each tube were filtered through a 2-mm sieve after treatment, and all remaining fragments were dried for 5 days. The fragments were weighed, and the difference from pretreatment was calculated. Differences in weights and laser settings were compared using one-tailed and two-sample t testing. Results: Each experiment resulted in a significant decrease in stone burden from prelaser weight (all P values = 0.00). Laser settings were manipulated between combinations of 1.0 J at a frequency of 20, 30, and 40 Hz, and an energy of 1.5 J and 20, 30, and 40 Hz. This resulted in a respective mean weight loss of -42%, -58%, and -47% at 1.0 J, and -24%, -56%, and -63% at 1.5 J. The t tests were performed to detect differences between weight loss and to determine the optimal settings. Laser settings of 1.5 J and 40 Hz for 2 minutes produced the greatest mean decrease in stone burden (63%). This loss was significantly different from that of all settings at 1.0 J and the setting of 1.5 and 20 Hz (P < 0.05). The mean percentage weight loss for each setting was then normalized to the total energy used. Settings of 1.0 J and 20 Hz were the most efficient, with a change in weight of -18% per kJ. Conclusions: We duplicated the "popcorn effect" of non-contact laser use in vitro. In this model, the technique results in a significant decrease in stone burden (up to 63%) in just 2 minutes. Adequate energy and high frequency seemed to optimize the effectiveness of the method, but excessive energy and frequency produced diminishing returns.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 649
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Bagley D, 1995, Tech Urol, V1, P25
  • [2] Das A, 1997, LASER SURG MED, V21, P198, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1997)21:2<198::AID-LSM12>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-B
  • [4] USE OF THE HOLMIUM - YAG LASER IN UROLOGY
    JOHNSON, DE
    CROMEENS, DM
    PRICE, RE
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 1992, 12 (04) : 353 - 363
  • [5] Effect of pulse width on object movement in vitro using holmium:YAG laser
    Kalra, Pankaj
    Le, Ngoc-Bich
    Bagley, Demetrius
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 228 - 231
  • [6] Effect of lithotripsy on holmium:YAG optical beam profile
    Lee, H
    Ryan, RT
    Teichman, JMH
    Landman, J
    Clayman, RV
    Milner, TE
    Welch, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (02) : 63 - 67
  • [7] HOLMIUM - YTTRIUM-ALUMINUM-GARNET LASER FOR ENDOSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY
    MATSUOKA, K
    IIDA, S
    NAKANAMI, M
    KOGA, H
    SHIMADA, A
    MIHARA, T
    NODA, S
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (06) : 947 - 952
  • [8] Sayer J., 1993, J Clin Laser Med Surg, V11, P61
  • [9] Holmium:YAG lithotripsy:: Optimal power settings
    Spore, SS
    Teichman, JMH
    Corbin, NS
    Champion, PC
    Williamson, EA
    Glickman, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (08) : 559 - 566
  • [10] Holmium:Yag lithotripsy efficiency varies with energy density
    Vassar, GJ
    Teichman, JMH
    Glickman, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) : 471 - 476