Development and Validation of Quality Indicators on Continuing Care for Patients With AUD: A Delphi Study

被引:8
|
作者
Bekkering, Geertruida E. [1 ]
Zeeuws, Dieter [2 ]
Lenaerts, Evelien [1 ]
Pas, Leo [1 ]
Verstuyf, Geert [3 ]
Matthys, Frieda [2 ,3 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [1 ]
Mathei, Catharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33,Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Psychiat, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] VAD Flemish Ctr Expertise Alcohol & Other Drugs, Vanderlindenstr 15, B-1030 Schaarbeek Brussels, Belgium
来源
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM | 2016年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
GUIDELINE-BASED DEVELOPMENT; IMPROVING PRIMARY-CARE; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; ADDICTION; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1093/alcalc/agw044
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop indicators to assess quality of continuing care for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). A guideline-based RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop and validate indicators regarding the process and outcome of continuing care. We systematically searched for evidence-based guidelines and existing quality indicators. A multidisciplinary expert panel prioritized recommendations using a written questionnaire followed by a group discussion. Important recommendations were then translated to quality indicators. The panel subsequently selected indicators that were measurable and applicable in Belgium. In a final round the indicators face-validity was assessed. We extracted 69 recommendations from 06 guidelines and 17 relevant quality indicators. Of all, 13 indicators remained after 03 written rounds and 02 group discussions. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The final set of selected indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The proposed set of indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality indicators for patients with traumatic brain injury in European intensive care units: a CENTER-TBI study
    Huijben, Jilske A.
    Wiegers, Eveline J. A.
    Ercole, Ari
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    Maas, Andrew I. R.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Citerio, Giuseppe
    Wilson, Lindsay
    Polinder, Suzanne
    Nieboer, Daan
    Menon, David
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    van der Jagt, Mathieu
    CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 24 (01):
  • [32] Development of a Set of Indicators for Measuring and Improving Quality of Rehabilitation Care after Ischemic Stroke
    De Cola, Maria Cristina
    Ielo, Augusto
    Corallo, Francesco
    Pollina Addario, Sebastiano
    Scondotto, Salvatore
    Allotta, Alessandra
    Fantaci, Giovanna
    Bramanti, Placido
    Ciurleo, Rosella
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (14)
  • [33] Construction of an instrument to evaluate the quality of hospital care provided in burns units in Brazil: A Delphi study
    Suzuki, Denise R. Rabelo
    Santana, Levy Aniceto
    Avila, Juliana Elvira H. Guerra
    Amorim, Fabio Ferreira
    Maldaner, Vinicius
    BURNS, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [34] Quality indicators for in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes: a systematic literature review and international Delphi study
    Van Grootven, Bastiaan
    McNicoll, Lynn
    Mendelson, Daniel A.
    Friedman, Susan M.
    Fagard, Katleen
    Milisen, Koen
    Flamaing, Johan
    Deschodt, Mieke
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [35] Improving Quality in Systems of Care: Solving Complicated Challenges with Simulation-Based Continuing Professional Development
    Dow, Alan W.
    Salas, Eduardo
    Mazmanian, Paul E.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2012, 32 (04) : 230 - 235
  • [36] Development of entrustable professional activities for paediatric intensive care fellows: A national modified Delphi study
    Hennus, Marije P.
    Nusmeier, Anneliese
    van Heesch, Gwen G. M.
    Riedijk, Maaike A.
    Schoenmaker, Nikki J.
    Soeteman, Marijn
    Wildschut, Enno D.
    Fawns, Tim
    Ten Cate, Olle
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [37] Identification of Quality of Care Deficiencies in Elderly Surgical Patients by Measuring Adherence to Process-Based Quality Indicators
    Bergman, Simon
    Martelli, Vanessa
    Monette, Michele
    Sourial, Nadia
    Deban, Melina
    Hamadani, Fadi
    Teasdale, Debby
    Holcroft, Christina
    Zakrzewski, Helena
    Fraser, Shannon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) : 858 - 866
  • [38] Characteristics of timely integration of palliative care into oncology hospital care for patients with incurable cancer: results of a Delphi Study
    Heipon, Carly S.
    Brom, Linda
    van der Linden, Yvette M.
    Tange, Dorien
    Reyners, Anna K. L.
    Raijmakers, Natasja J. H.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [39] Validation of patient- and GP-reported core sets of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care: results of the cross-sectional observational MULTIqual validation study
    Schaefer, Ingmar
    Schulze, Josefine
    Glassen, Katharina
    Breckner, Amanda
    Hansen, Heike
    Rakebrandt, Anja
    Berg, Jessica
    Blozik, Eva
    Szecsenyi, Joachim
    Luehmann, Dagmar
    Scherer, Martin
    BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [40] Testing the construct validity of hospital care quality indicators: a case study on hip replacement
    Fischer, Claudia
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Anema, Helen A.
    Kievit, Job
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Klazinga, Niek
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16 : 1 - 10