Development and Validation of Quality Indicators on Continuing Care for Patients With AUD: A Delphi Study

被引:8
|
作者
Bekkering, Geertruida E. [1 ]
Zeeuws, Dieter [2 ]
Lenaerts, Evelien [1 ]
Pas, Leo [1 ]
Verstuyf, Geert [3 ]
Matthys, Frieda [2 ,3 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [1 ]
Mathei, Catharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33,Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Psychiat, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] VAD Flemish Ctr Expertise Alcohol & Other Drugs, Vanderlindenstr 15, B-1030 Schaarbeek Brussels, Belgium
来源
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM | 2016年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
GUIDELINE-BASED DEVELOPMENT; IMPROVING PRIMARY-CARE; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; ADDICTION; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1093/alcalc/agw044
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop indicators to assess quality of continuing care for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). A guideline-based RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop and validate indicators regarding the process and outcome of continuing care. We systematically searched for evidence-based guidelines and existing quality indicators. A multidisciplinary expert panel prioritized recommendations using a written questionnaire followed by a group discussion. Important recommendations were then translated to quality indicators. The panel subsequently selected indicators that were measurable and applicable in Belgium. In a final round the indicators face-validity was assessed. We extracted 69 recommendations from 06 guidelines and 17 relevant quality indicators. Of all, 13 indicators remained after 03 written rounds and 02 group discussions. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The final set of selected indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The proposed set of indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality Indicators for Rehabilitation Care Among Patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Multicenter Study, Cross sectional study.
    Makarm, Wafaa K.
    Abu-Zaid, Mohammad Hassan
    Alramadhani, Ibrahim A.
    Elsheikh, Ahmed M.
    Zaghlol, Rabab S.
    PHYSIKALISCHE MEDIZIN REHABILITATIONSMEDIZIN KURORTMEDIZIN, 2023,
  • [22] Defining the quality of interdisciplinary care for patients with brain metastases: modified Delphi panel recommendations
    Fadul, Camilo E.
    Sheehan, Jason P.
    Silvestre, Julio
    Bonilla, Gloribel
    Bovi, Joseph A.
    Ahluwalia, Manmeet
    Soffietti, Riccardo
    Hui, David
    Anderson, Roger
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2024, 25 (09) : e432 - e440
  • [23] Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach
    Martin Luke Canning
    Michael Barras
    Ross McDougall
    Stephanie Yerkovich
    Ian Coombes
    Clair Sullivan
    Karen Whitfield
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2024, 46 : 451 - 462
  • [24] Patients with colorectal cancer A qualitative study of referral pathways and continuing care
    Harris, Mark F.
    Pascoe, Shane
    Crossland, Lisa
    Beilby, Justin
    Veitch, Craig
    Spigelman, Allan
    Weller, David
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2012, 41 (11) : 899 - 902
  • [25] Association between drug-specific indicators of prescribing quality and quality of drug treatment: a validation study
    Wallerstedt, Susanna M.
    Belfrage, Bjoern
    Fastbom, Johan
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 (09) : 906 - 914
  • [26] Is palliative care support associated with better quality end-of-life care indicators for patients with advanced cancer? A retrospective cohort study
    Ziegler, Lucy E.
    Craigs, Cheryl L.
    West, Robert M.
    Carder, Paul
    Hurlow, Adam
    Millares-Martin, Pablo
    Hall, Geoff
    Bennett, Michael I.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [27] Quality indicators for in-hospital management of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results of an international Delphi study
    Lodewijckx, Cathy
    Sermeus, Walter
    Panella, Massimiliano
    Deneckere, Svin
    Leigheb, Fabrizio
    Troosters, Thierry
    Boto, Paulo Alexandre
    Mendes, Rita Veloso
    Decramer, Marc
    Vanhaecht, Kris
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2013, 69 (02) : 348 - 362
  • [28] Development and validation of quality of life questionnaire in pseudophakic patients in portuguese
    Hida, Wilson Takashi
    Nakano, Celso Takashi
    Yamane, Iris
    Motta, Antonio FranciscoPimenta
    Tzeliks, Patrick Frenzel
    Guimaraes, Aline Silva
    de Alencar, Luciana Malta
    Fix Ventura, Dora Selma
    Alves, Milton Ruiz
    Jose Junior, Newton Kara
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 72 (06) : 388 - 395
  • [29] Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study
    Boesveld, Inge C.
    Hermus, Marieke A. A.
    de Graaf, Hanneke J.
    Hitzert, Marit
    van der Pal-de Bruin, Karin M.
    de Vries, Raymond G.
    Franx, Arie
    Wiegers, Therese A.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [30] Development and validation of a postgraduate anaesthesiology core curriculum based on Entrustable Professional Activities: a Delphi study
    Moll-Khosrawi, Parisa
    Ganzhorn, Alexander
    Zoellner, Christian
    Schulte-Uentrop, Leonie
    GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 37 (05): : 1 - 23