Development and Validation of Quality Indicators on Continuing Care for Patients With AUD: A Delphi Study

被引:8
|
作者
Bekkering, Geertruida E. [1 ]
Zeeuws, Dieter [2 ]
Lenaerts, Evelien [1 ]
Pas, Leo [1 ]
Verstuyf, Geert [3 ]
Matthys, Frieda [2 ,3 ]
Aertgeerts, Bert [1 ]
Mathei, Catharina [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Acad Ctr Gen Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33,Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Psychiat, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] VAD Flemish Ctr Expertise Alcohol & Other Drugs, Vanderlindenstr 15, B-1030 Schaarbeek Brussels, Belgium
来源
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM | 2016年 / 51卷 / 05期
关键词
GUIDELINE-BASED DEVELOPMENT; IMPROVING PRIMARY-CARE; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; ADDICTION; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1093/alcalc/agw044
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
To develop indicators to assess quality of continuing care for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). A guideline-based RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop and validate indicators regarding the process and outcome of continuing care. We systematically searched for evidence-based guidelines and existing quality indicators. A multidisciplinary expert panel prioritized recommendations using a written questionnaire followed by a group discussion. Important recommendations were then translated to quality indicators. The panel subsequently selected indicators that were measurable and applicable in Belgium. In a final round the indicators face-validity was assessed. We extracted 69 recommendations from 06 guidelines and 17 relevant quality indicators. Of all, 13 indicators remained after 03 written rounds and 02 group discussions. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The final set of selected indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended. This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for continuing care for AUD. The proposed set of indicators consisted of 10 process and 03 outcome indicators. As the level of evidence of effective continuing care components is very low further development of the indicators is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 561
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of Quality Indicators of Care for Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using a Delphi Process
    Dixon, Elijah
    Armstrong, Christopher
    Maddern, Guy
    Sutherland, Francis
    Hemming, Alan
    Wei, Alice
    Sherman, Morris
    Moore, Malcolm
    Mckay, Andrew
    Urbach, David
    Labrie, Martin
    Gordon, Lee
    Barkun, Jeffrey
    Quan, May Lynn
    Dowden, Scot
    Bigam, David
    Gallinger, Steven
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 156 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [2] Development of quality indicators to monitor radiotherapy care for men with prostate cancer: A modified Delphi method
    Tsiamis, Ellie
    Millar, Jeremy
    Baxi, Siddhartha
    Borg, Martin
    De Ieso, Paolo
    Elsaleh, Hany
    Foroudi, Farshad
    Higgs, Braden
    Holt, Tanya
    Martin, Jarad
    Moretti, Kim
    Pryor, David
    Skalam, Marketa
    Evans, Sue
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (02) : 308 - 314
  • [3] Perioperative diabetes care: development and validation of quality indicators throughout the entire hospital care pathway
    Hommel, Inge
    van Gurp, Petra J.
    Tack, Cees J.
    Wollersheim, Hub
    Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (07) : 525 - 534
  • [4] Development of a longlist of healthcare quality indicators for physical activity of patients during hospital stay: a modified RAND Delphi study
    Koenders, Niek
    van den Heuvel, Stein
    Bloemen, Shanna
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [5] The development of indicators to measure the quality of clinical care in emergency departments following a Modified-Delphi approach
    Lindsay, P
    Schull, M
    Bronskill, S
    Anderson, G
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 9 (11) : 1131 - 1139
  • [6] Key interventions and quality indicators for quality improvement of STEMI care: a RAND Delphi survey
    Aeyels, Daan
    Sinnaeve, Peter R.
    Claeys, Marc J.
    Gevaert, Sofie
    Schoors, Danny
    Sermeus, Walter
    Panella, Massimiliano
    Coeckelberghs, Ellen
    Bruyneel, Luk
    Vanhaecht, Kris
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2018, 73 (06) : 518 - 527
  • [7] Development of Generic Quality Indicators for Patient-Centered Cancer Care by Using a RAND Modified Delphi Method
    Uphoff, Eleonora P. M. M.
    Wennekes, Lianne
    Punt, Cornelis J. A.
    Grol, Richard P. T. M.
    Wollersheim, Hub C. H.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    Ottevanger, Petronella B.
    CANCER NURSING, 2012, 35 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [8] Development of quality of care indicators for patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement
    SooHoo, N. F.
    Lieberman, J. R.
    Farng, E.
    Park, S.
    Jain, S.
    Ko, C. Y.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (02) : 153 - 157
  • [9] Development of prescribing indicators related to opioid-related harm in patients with chronic pain in primary care-a modified e-Delphi study
    Bansal, Neetu
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    Lin, Chiu-Yi
    Ashcroft, Darren M.
    Chen, Li-Chia
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [10] Systematic Quality Monitoring For Specialized Palliative Care Services: Development of a Minimal Set of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Study (QPAC)
    Leemans, Kathleen
    Deliens, L.
    Van den Block, L.
    Vander Stichele, R.
    Francke, A. L.
    Cohen, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 34 (06) : 532 - 546