Assessment of clinical response after two cycles of primary chemotherapy in breast cancer

被引:11
作者
Beresford, Mark J. [1 ,2 ]
Stott, David [2 ,3 ]
Makris, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Bristol Oncol Ctr, Bristol BS2 8ED, Avon, England
[2] Mt Vernon Canc Ctr, Northwood, Middx, England
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Hlth Res Dev & Support Unit, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
关键词
breast cancer; clinical assessment; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; response prediction;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-007-9644-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Complete clinical (cCR) and pathological (pCR) response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is associated with improved survival. Various imaging and immunological techniques have been tested as predictors of response early in the course of chemotherapy, but their predictive value has not been compared with that of a simple early clinical assessment. Patients and methods Two hundred breast cancer patients (T2-4, N0-1) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical response after two cycles of treatment was compared with final clinical and pathological response. The likelihood of achieving cCR or pCR was compared by response after two cycles. Results Overall final clinical response rate was 79% (30.5% cCR and 11.9% pCR). After two cycles of chemotherapy, clinical response rate was 54.5%. For responders after two cycles, final cCR = 51.3% and pCR = 21.5%. For non-responders after two cycles, cCR = 5.5% and pCR = 1.2%. Response after two cycles predicts for pCR (P = 0.003; sensitivity 95.2%, specificity 52.9%). Conclusions Clinical response after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts for pCR and is a valid early end-point that could be incorporated into the design of future neoadjuvant trials.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 342
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AHSEE ML, 2004, DOES VASCULAR IMAGIN
[2]   Serial integrated 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine PET/CT monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response in invasive ductal carcinoma [J].
Beresford, Mark ;
Lyburn, Iain ;
Sanghera, Bal ;
Makris, Andreas ;
Wong, Wai-Lup .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (04) :424-425
[3]   Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: Eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute [J].
Bonadonna, G ;
Valagussa, P ;
Brambilla, C ;
Ferrari, L ;
Moliterni, A ;
Terenziani, M ;
Zambetti, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (01) :93-100
[4]  
Burcombe R. J., 2001, European Journal of Cancer, V37, pS181, DOI 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)81153-9
[5]   Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer [J].
Chang, J ;
Powles, TJ ;
Allred, DC ;
Ashey, SE ;
Clark, GM ;
Makris, A ;
Assersohn, L ;
Gregory, RK ;
Osborne, CK ;
Dowsett, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) :3058-3063
[6]   Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoa uvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival [J].
Cleator, SJ ;
Makris, A ;
Ashley, SE ;
Lal, R ;
Powles, TJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (02) :267-272
[7]   PROBLEMS IN EVALUATING RESPONSE OF PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER TO SYSTEMIC THERAPY [J].
COCCONI, G ;
DIBLASIO, B ;
ALBERTI, G ;
BISAGNI, G ;
BOTTI, E ;
PERACCHIA, G .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1984, 4 (04) :309-313
[8]   Clinical prognostic and predictive factors for primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer [J].
Ellis, P ;
Smith, I ;
Ashley, S ;
Walsh, G ;
Ebbs, S ;
Baum, M ;
Sacks, N ;
McKinna, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (01) :107-114
[9]   Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Bryant, J ;
Wolmark, N ;
Mamounas, E ;
Brown, A ;
Fisher, ER ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Begovic, M ;
DeCillis, A ;
Robidoux, A ;
Margolese, RG ;
Cruz, AB ;
Hoehn, JL ;
Lees, AW ;
Dimitrov, NV ;
Bear, HD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) :2672-2685
[10]  
HORTOBAGYI GN, 1988, CANCER, V62, P2507, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19881215)62:12<2507::AID-CNCR2820621210>3.0.CO