Evaluating Patient Preferences of Maintenance Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment in the UK, USA and Germany

被引:8
作者
Lewis, Hannah B. [1 ]
Schroeder, Melanie [2 ]
Gunsoy, Necdet B. [3 ]
Janssen, Ellen M. [4 ]
Llewellyn, Samuel [5 ]
Doll, Helen A. [1 ]
Jones, Paul W. [6 ]
Ismaila, Afisi S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] ICON Plc, Patient Centred Outcomes, London, England
[2] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Value Evidence & Outcomes, Brentford, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Value Evidence & Outcomes, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[4] ICON Plc, Patient Centred Outcomes, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[5] ICON Plc, Patient Centred Outcomes, Abingdon, Oxon, England
[6] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Resp Therapy Area, Brentford, England
[7] GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Value Evidence & Outcomes, 1250 South Collegeville Rd, Collegeville, PA 19426 USA
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词
discrete choice experiment; DCE; symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD; stated-preference methods; TRIPLE THERAPY; COPD; HEALTH; VALIDITY; TIME;
D O I
10.2147/COPD.S221980
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: With increasing availability of different treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we sought to understand patient preferences for COPD treatment in the UK, USA, and Germany using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods: Qualitative research identified six attributes associated with COPD maintenance treatments: ease of inhaler use, exacerbation frequency, frequency of inhaler use, number of different inhalers used, side effect frequency, and out-of-pocket costs. A DCE using these attributes, with three levels each, was designed and tested through cognitive interviews and piloting. It comprised 18 choice sets, selected using a D-efficient experimental design. Demographics and disease history were collected and the final DCE survey was completed online by participants recruited from panels in the UK, USA and Germany. Responses were analyzed using mixed logit models, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Results: Overall, 450 participants (150 per country) completed the DCE; most (UK and Germany, 97.3%; USA, 98.0%) were included in the final analysis. Based on relative attribute importance, avoidance of side effects was found to be most important (UK: OR 11.65; USA: OR 7.17; Germany: OR 11.45; all p<0.0001), followed by the likelihood of fewer exacerbations (UK: OR 2.22; USA: OR 1.63; Germany . OR 2.54; all p<0.0001) and increased ease of use (UK: OR 1.84; USA: OR 1.84; Germany: OR 1.60; all p<0.0001). Number of inhalers, outof-pocket costs, and frequency of inhaler use were found to be less important. Preferences were relatively consistent across the three countries. All participants required a reduction in exacer-bations to accept more frequent inhaler use or use of more inhalers. Conclusion: When selecting COPD treatment, individuals assigned the highest value to the avoidance of side effects, experiencing fewer exacerbations, and ease of inhaler use. Ensuring that patients' preferences are considered may encourage treatment compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 604
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, TIMES INDIA
  • [2] Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Bestall, JC
    Paul, EA
    Garrod, R
    Garnham, R
    Jones, PW
    Wedzicha, JA
    [J]. THORAX, 1999, 54 (07) : 581 - 586
  • [3] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [4] ChoiceMetrics, 2018, Ngene User Manual & Reference Guide
  • [5] Patterns and characterization of COPD exacerbations using real-time data collection
    Ejiofor, Stanley I.
    Stolk, Jan
    Fernandez, Pablo
    Stockley, Robert A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2017, 12 : 427 - 434
  • [6] Global burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Halbert, R. J.
    Natoli, J. L.
    Gano, A.
    Badamgarav, E.
    Buist, A. S.
    Mannino, D. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 28 (03) : 523 - 532
  • [7] Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
    Prior, Thomas
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Cunningham, Charles
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) : 300 - 315
  • [8] Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
    Janssen, Ellen M.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (06) : 531 - 542
  • [9] A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes
    Janssen, Ellen M.
    Segal, Jodi B.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (05) : 465 - 479
  • [10] The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Yang, Jui-Chen
    Reed, Shelby D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (02) : 157 - 160