The Uses and Abuses of Moral Theory in Bioethics

被引:4
作者
De Vries, Raymond [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth & Social Sci Med, Dept Med Educ,Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Sociol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Empirical ethics; Is/ought problem; Sociology of bioethics; Upstream bioethics; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10677-011-9290-y
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Moral theory is an important guide to bioethical decision-making, but it can confuse and mislead those who offer ethical advice to clinicians and researchers, delaying decisions that must be made in a timely fashion. In this paper I examine the ways moral theory can lead bioethicists astray. Absent a sensitivity to the empirical realities of ethical problems, moral theory 1) contributes to the disappearance of the persons caught in an ethical quandary, 2) focuses on the puzzle-solving rather than examining the conditions that generate moral problems, and 3) universalizes ethical dilemmas, overlooking local processes for resolving moral questions. Taken together, empirically informed moral theory and theoretically informed empirical research can help bioethicists transcend the is/ought problem in ethical work.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 430
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CARING HOSPITALS NUR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, HUMANISTIC PERSPECTI
[4]  
[Anonymous], BMC MED ETHICS
[5]  
BAYERTZ K, 2006, GLOBAL BIOETHICS COL, P207
[6]   WHOSE SIDE ARE WE ON [J].
BECKER, HS .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1967, 14 (03) :239-247
[7]   Achieving gold standards in ethics and human rights in medical practice [J].
Benatar, SR .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) :717-718
[8]   Just Another Test? [J].
Bonifacio, Herbert J. ;
Janvier, Annie .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2010, 40 (01) :13-14
[9]  
Boyle J., 2006, GLOBAL BIOETHICS, P300
[10]  
Cassell EricJ., 1991, The Nature of Suffering