Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography

被引:119
作者
De Pierro, AR [1 ]
Yamagishi, MEB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Appl Math, BR-13081970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
expectation-maximization algorithm; ordered subsets maximum-likelihood algorithm; positron emission tomography; regularization;
D O I
10.1109/42.921477
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The maximum-likelihood (ML) approach in emission tomography provides images with superior noise characteristics compared to conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms, The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is an iterative algorithm for maximizing the Poisson likelihood in emission computed tomography that became very popular for solving the ML problem because of its attractive theoretical and practical properties. Recently, (Browne and DePierro, 1996 and Hudson and Larkin, 1994) block sequential versions of the EM algorithm that take advantage of the scanner's geometry have been proposed in order to accelerate its convergence. In Hudson and Larkin, 1994, the ordered subsets EM (OS-EM) method was applied to the ML problem and a modification (OS-GP) to the maximum a posteriori (MAP) regularized approach without showing convergence, In Browne and DePierro, 1996, we presented a relaxed version of OS-EM (RAMLA) that converges to an ML solution. In this paper, we present an extension of RAMLA for MAP reconstruction We show that, if the sequence generated by this method converges, then it must converge to the true MAP solution. Experimental evidence of this convergence is also shown, To illustrate this behavior we apply the algorithm to positron emission tomography simulated data comparing its performance to OS-GP.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 288
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Avriel M., 2003, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[2]   A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization [J].
Bouman, CA ;
Sauer, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (03) :480-492
[3]   A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihoods in emission tomography [J].
Browne, J ;
DePierro, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) :687-699
[4]  
Browne J.A., 1993, MIPG198 U PENNS DEP
[5]  
Browne JA, 1996, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V7, P256, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(199623)7:3<256::AID-IMA14>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-X
[7]  
Budinger T. F., 1979, Image reconstruction from projections. Implementation and applications, P147
[8]   STRONG UNDERRELAXATION IN KACZMARZS METHOD FOR INCONSISTENT SYSTEMS [J].
CENSOR, Y ;
EGGERMONT, PPB ;
GORDON, D .
NUMERISCHE MATHEMATIK, 1983, 41 (01) :83-92
[9]  
Csiszar I., 1984, STATISTICS DECISIO S, V1, P205
[10]   Fast iterative methods applied to tomography models with general Gibbs priors [J].
De Pierro, AR ;
Yamagishi, MEB .
MATHEMATICAL MODELING, BAYESIAN ESTIMATION, AND INVERSE PROBLEMS, 1999, 3816 :134-138