Comparison of visual and optical quality of monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lenses

被引:28
作者
Altemir-Gomez, Irene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Millan, Maria S. [4 ]
Vega, Fidel [4 ]
Bartol-Puyal, Francisco [1 ]
Gimenez-Calvo, Galadriel [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Larrosa, Jose M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Polo, Vicente [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pablo, Luis E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garcia-Martin, Elena [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Miguel Servet Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
[2] Aragon Hlth Sci Inst IIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
[4] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Fac Opt & Optometry Terrassa, BarcelonaTech, Appl Opt & Image Proc Grp GOAPI, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Prov Nuestra Senora Gracia, Dept Ophthalmol, Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
Intraocular lens; monofocal lens; multifocal intraocular lens; optical bench; optical quality; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; ACUITY; IMPLANTATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/1120672119827858
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare visual quality in patients implanted with Tecnis(R) monofocal (ZCB00) and multifocal (ZMB00) intraocular lenses taking into account their optical quality measured in vitro with an eye model. Methods: In total, 122 patients participated in this study: 44 implanted with monofocal and 78 with multifocal intraocular lenses. Measurements of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were performed. The optical quality of the intraocular lenses was evaluated in three image planes (distance, intermediate and near) using an eye model on a test bench. The metric considered was the area under the curve of the modulation transfer function. Results: Optical quality at the far focus of the monofocal intraocular lens (area under the curve of the modulation transfer function = 66.97) was considerably better than that with the multifocal lens (area under the curve of the modulation transfer function = 32.54). However, no significant differences were observed between groups at the distance-corrected visual acuity. Distance-corrected near vision was better in the multifocal (0.15 +/- 0.20 logMAR) than that in the monofocal group (0.43 +/- 0.21 logMAR, p < 0.001), which correlated with the better optical quality at near reached by the multifocal intraocular lens (area under the curve of the modulation transfer function = 29.11) in comparison with the monofocal intraocular lens (area under the curve of the modulation transfer function = 5.0). In intermediate vision, visual acuity was 0.28 +/- 0.16 logMAR (multifocal) and 0.36 +/- 0.14 logMAR (monofocal) with p = 0.014, also in good agreement with the values measured in the optical quality (area under the curve of the modulation transfer function = 10.69 (multifocal) and 8.86 (monofocal)). The contrast sensitivity was similar in almost all frequencies. Pelli-Robson was slightly better in the monofocal (1.73) than in the multifocal group (1.64; p = 0.023). Conclusion: Patients implanted with multifocal ZMB00 achieved a distance visual acuity similar to those implanted with monofocal ZCB00, but showed significantly better intermediate and near visual acuity. A correlation was found between intraocular lenses' optical quality and patients' visual acuity. Contrast sensitivity was very similar between the multifocal and monofocal groups.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 306
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Preclinical metrics to predict through-focus visual acuity for pseudophakic patients
    Alarcon, Aixa
    Canovas, Carmen
    Rosen, Robert
    Weeber, Henk
    Tsai, Linda
    Hileman, Kendra
    Piers, Patricia
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2016, 7 (05): : 1877 - 1888
  • [2] Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models
    Alfonso, Jose F.
    Fernandez-Vega, Luis
    Puchades, Cristina
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [3] Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses -: Comparative clinical study
    Alió, JL
    Tavolato, M
    De la Hoz, F
    Claramonte, P
    Rodríguez-Prats, JL
    Galal, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (12) : 2494 - 2503
  • [4] Femtosecond Laser Cataract Surgery: Updates on Technologies and Outcomes
    Alio, Jorge L.
    Abdou, Ahmed A.
    Puente, Alfonso Arias
    Zato, Miguel Angel
    Nagy, Zoltan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (06) : 420 - 427
  • [5] Visual acuity and image quality in 5 diffractive intraocular lenses
    Cardona, Genis
    Vega, Fidel
    Gil, Miguel A.
    Varon, Consuelo
    Buil, Jose A.
    Millan, Maria S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [6] Comparison of the efficiency, MTF and chromatic properties of four diffractive bifocal intraocular lens designs
    Castignoles, Fannie
    Flury, Manuel
    Lepine, Thierry
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2010, 18 (05): : 5245 - 5256
  • [7] Visual acuity and patient satisfaction at varied distances and lighting conditions after implantation of an aspheric diffractive multifocal one-piece intraocular lens
    Chang, Daniel H.
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 1471 - 1477
  • [8] Correlation between optics quality of multifocal intraocular lenses and visual acuity Tolerance to modulation transfer function decay
    Felipe, Adelina
    Pastor, Francisco
    Artigas, Jose M.
    Diez-Ajenjo, Amparo
    Gene, Andres
    Menezo, Jose L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (04) : 557 - 562
  • [9] Goodman J. W., INTRO FOURIER OPTICS
  • [10] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 11979- 2:2014