Barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation from the expert's view: A cross-sectional survey

被引:4
作者
Maiwald, Phillip [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weis, Joachim [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kurlemann, Ulrich [5 ]
Dresch, Carolin [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Rademaker, Anna Lena [7 ]
Valentini, Jan [8 ]
Joos, Stefanie [8 ]
Heidt, Vitali [9 ]
Bartsch, Hans Helge [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Tumor Biol Ctr, Fac Med, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Sect Hlth Care Res & Rehabil Res, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Freiburg, Endowment Professorship Self Help Res, Fac Med, Freiburg, Germany
[5] Munster Univ Hosp, German Profess Assoc Social Work Hlth Care eV, Munster, Germany
[6] Univ Educ Freiburg, Res Methods Dept, Freiburg, Germany
[7] Bielefeld Univ Appl Sci FH Bielefeld, Fac Social Sci, German Profess Assoc Social Work Hlth Care & DVSG, Bielefeld, Germany
[8] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Inst Gen Practice & Interprofess Care, Tubingen, Germany
[9] Sci Inst Off Based Hematologists & Oncologists WI, Cologne, Germany
关键词
barriers; cancer rehabilitation; expert study; health services accessibility; professionals in health care; utilisation; BREAST-CANCER; PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS; CARE; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13522
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective The goal of this study was to investigate barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation by querying a large sample of various professionals in health care with a comprehensive set of barriers. Methods We developed a questionnaire comprising 55 barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation and administered it to four different types of medical, care and social work experts involved in the referral to cancer rehabilitation. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and the extracted factors were ranked by mean values. Additionally, ANOVAs were calculated to test for group differences. Results Our sample (N = 606) consisted of 249 physicians, 194 social workers, 105 nurses and 55 psychologists in Germany. We identified seven barrier-dimensions: low appreciation of rehabilitation by professionals, insufficient coordination, insufficient application procedure, rehabilitation requirements not met, patients' unfulfilled demands, patients' social responsibilities and patients' coping style, with the latter being rated as the most obstructive thereof. Furthermore, we found statistically significant group differences for six of these factors with small- to medium-sized effects. Conclusion Our results support previous publications implicating the patients' coping style as a barrier. We furthermore found evidence for barriers relating to processes and organisational issues, thereby expanding on the scope of patient-oriented publications. Suggestions for improving patients' health services accessibility are made.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) [J].
Allemani, Claudia ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Carreira, Helena ;
Harewood, Rhea ;
Spika, Devon ;
Wang, Xiao-Si ;
Bannon, Finian ;
Ahn, Jane V. ;
Johnson, Christopher J. ;
Bonaventure, Audrey ;
Marcos-Gragera, Rafael ;
Stiller, Charles ;
Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar ;
Chen, Wan-Qing ;
Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J. ;
Rachet, Bernard ;
Soeberg, Matthew J. ;
You, Hui ;
Matsuda, Tomohiro ;
Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena ;
Storm, Hans ;
Tucker, Thomas C. ;
Coleman, Michel P. .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9972) :977-1010
[2]  
Bengel J., 2006, Research in Rehabilitation: Results from a Research Network in Southwest Germany, P3
[3]   Exploration of the contexts surrounding the implementation of an intervention supporting return-to-work after breast cancer in a primary care setting: starting point for an intervention development [J].
Bilodeau, Karine ;
Tremblay, Dominique ;
Durand, Marie-Jose .
JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2018, 11 :75-83
[4]   Prevalence and treatment patterns of physical impairments in patients with metastatic breast cancer [J].
Cheville, Andrea L. ;
Troxel, Andrea B. ;
Basford, Jeffrey R. ;
Kornblith, Alice B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (16) :2621-2629
[5]   Reasons for the Non-Utilisation of an Oncological Rehabilitation. Results of a Written Survey with Patients of Oncological Healthcare Centers [J].
Deck, Ruth ;
Babaev, Valentin ;
Katalinic, Alexander .
REHABILITATION, 2019, 58 (04) :243-252
[6]   Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistics, 2014 [J].
DeSantis, Carol E. ;
Lin, Chun Chieh ;
Mariotto, Angela B. ;
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Stein, Kevin D. ;
Kramer, Joan L. ;
Alteri, Rick ;
Robbins, Anthony S. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2014, 64 (04) :252-271
[7]  
Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, 2019, RENTENVERSICHERUNG Z, V22
[8]   Barriers in the Application Process for Oncological Rehabilitation: Results of a Qualitative Expert Survey [J].
Dresch, Carolin ;
Bartsch, Hans Helge ;
Kurlemann, Ulrich ;
Maiwald, Phillip ;
Rademaker, Anna Lena ;
Valentini, Jan ;
Joos, Stefanie ;
Heidt, Vitali ;
Weis, Joachim .
REHABILITATION, 2021, 60 (04) :235-242
[9]   Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: Patient and provider perspective [J].
Eakin, EG ;
Strycker, LA .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2001, 10 (02) :103-113
[10]  
Fields A., 2013, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, V4th