Parental consent and adolescent risk behavior research

被引:125
作者
Tigges, BB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Coll Nursing, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
parental consent; informed consent; adolescents;
D O I
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00283.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify methodological issues related to the use of active or passive parental consent in school-based research on adolescent risk behavior research and to propose recommendations consistent with current legal and ethical standards in the United States. Methods: Review and synthesis of the professional literature related to adolescents and parental consent, federal regulations and guidelines in the United States, and the author's experience presenting these arguments and issues to institutional review boards and funding agencies for over 10 years. Findings: The procedures used for parental consent affect a study's participation rates, costs, and selection bias. When active parental consent is required, parental permission is typically obtained for only 30%-60% of students, compared to 93%-100% when passive consent is used. Extensive follow-up may result in 55%-100% of parents giving permission, but at significant cost (typically $20-$25 per student). Active consent results in the exclusion of minorities, students having problems in school, and students already engaged in or at risk for problem behaviors. Strong methodological reasons were identified for using passive parental consent procedures when possible. Current federal regulations include four areas for possible waiver or alterations in parental consent procedures, including the use of passive parental consent. Conclusions: Health researchers must understand the methodological, legal, and ethical issues related to parental consent to produce high-quality, valid research about adolescents and to provide evidence for laws, policies, and regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based survey research [J].
Anderman, C ;
Cheadle, A ;
Curry, S ;
Diehr, P ;
Shultz, L ;
Wagner, E .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1995, 19 (06) :663-674
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, BELM REP ETH PRINC G
[3]   Characteristics of responding-, nonresponding- and refusing-parents in an adolescent lifestyle choice study [J].
Baker, JR ;
Yardley, JK ;
McCaul, K .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 2001, 25 (06) :605-618
[4]  
Boonstra H., 2000, The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, V4, P4
[5]  
Brooks-Gunn Jeanne, 1994, Ethics Behav, V4, P109, DOI 10.1207/s15327019eb0402_4
[6]   DEMOGRAPHIC, PSYCHOSOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL-DIFFERENCES IN SAMPLES OF ACTIVELY AND PASSIVELY CONSENTED ADOLESCENTS [J].
DENT, CW ;
GALAIF, J ;
SUSSMAN, S ;
STACY, A ;
BURTUN, D ;
FLAY, BR .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1993, 18 (01) :51-56
[7]   INFORMED CONSENT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS - AGE, MATURATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE [J].
DORN, LD ;
SUSMAN, EJ ;
FLETCHER, JC .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1995, 16 (03) :185-190
[8]   AN ASSESSMENT OF ACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE METHODS FOR OBTAINING PARENTAL CONSENT [J].
ELLICKSON, PL ;
HAWES, JA .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1989, 13 (01) :45-55
[9]  
ELLIOTT MM, 2002, I REV BOARD MANAGEME, P250
[10]   Guidelines for adolescent health research: Legal perspectives [J].
English, A .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1995, 17 (05) :277-286