Artificial neural networks vs linear regression in a fluid mechanics and chemical modelling problem: Elimination of hydrogen sulphide in a lab-scale biofilter

被引:1
作者
Ibarra-Berastegi, G.
Elias, A.
Arias, R.
Barona, A.
机构
来源
2007 IEEE/ACS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2 | 2007年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/AICCSA.2007.370941
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A biofilter is a biological reactor in which a certain pollutant is eliminated by the action of microorganisms. In this work, the removal efficiency of a lab-scale biofilter for eliminating hydrogen sulphide (H2S) has been modelled. To that end, multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks and multiple linear regression (MLR) have been used and then, results obtained with both techniques have been compared. The biofilter has been operating during 194 days and for modelling purposes, it has been considered as a system in which changes in the flow and concentration of H2S entering the biofilter are followed by changes in the removal efficiency of the reactor. In all cases, to obtain true representative values corresponding to the different equilibrium situations, be re removal efficiencies (outputs) were measured, 24 hours were allowed after the H2S load was changed by altering the inlet concentration and flow. The results showed that a multilayer perceptron 2-2-1 (MLP) model was able to explain 92% (R-2=0. 92) of the overall variability detected in the removal efficiency of the biofilter corresponding to a wide range of operating conditions. The MLR model yielded a value of R-2=0. 72. The MLP outperforms the MLR though not dramatically. The explanation might be that the combination of a great number of highly non-linear mechanisms tends to linearize the overall effect, at least to a certain extent. As a conclusion, the use of neural networks and more specifically, MLP models can describe the behaviour of a biofilter more accurately than simple linear regression models.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 587
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] ALTAF H, 1998, J HAZARD MATER, V60, P237
  • [2] Biofilter response to gradual and sudden variations in operating conditions
    Barona, A
    Elías, A
    Arias, R
    Cano, I
    González, R
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2004, 22 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [3] An improved differential evolution method for efficient parameter estimation in biofilter modeling
    Bhat, TR
    Venkataramani, D
    Ravi, V
    Murty, CVS
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2006, 28 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [4] Bishop CM., 1995, Neural networks for pattern recognition
  • [5] A phenomenological review of biofilter models
    Devinny, JS
    Ramesh, J
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2005, 113 (2-3) : 187 - 196
  • [6] Evaluation of a packing material for the biodegradation of H2S and product analysis
    Elias, A
    Barona, A
    Arreguy, A
    Rios, J
    Aranguiz, I
    Peñas, J
    [J]. PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 37 (08) : 813 - 820
  • [7] Elias A, 1996, DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF COMPUTER TECHNIQUES TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES VI, P153
  • [8] Haykins S., 1994, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
  • [9] REMOVAL KINETICS OF HYDROGEN-SULFIDE, METHANETHIOL AND DIMETHYL SULFIDE BY PEAT BIOFILTERS
    HIRAI, M
    OHTAKE, M
    SHODA, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FERMENTATION AND BIOENGINEERING, 1990, 70 (05): : 334 - 339
  • [10] IBARRABERASTEGI G, 2006, SHORT TERM PREDICTIO, P23