Immobilizing corporate income shifting: Should it be safe to strip in the harbor?

被引:13
作者
Gresik, Thomas A. [1 ]
Schindler, Dirk [2 ]
Schjelderup, Guttorm [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Norwegian Sch Econ, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Multinational; Income-shifting; Safe harbor; Earnings stripping; THIN-CAPITALIZATION RULES; TAX COMPETITION; IMPACT; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.06.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many subsidiaries can deduct interest payments on internal debt from their taxable income. By issuing internal debt from a tax haven, multinationals can shift income out of host countries through the interest rates they charge and the amount of internal debt they issue. We show that, from a welfare perspective, thin capitalization rules that restrict the amount of debt for which interest is tax deductible (safe harbor rules) are inferior to rules that limit the ratio of debt interest to pre-tax earnings (earnings stripping rules), even if a safe harbor rule is used in conjunction with an earnings stripping rule. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 78
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, OECD TRANSF PRIC GUI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, working paper No. 2456
[3]  
Blouin J, 2015, DOES ORG AFFECT FORE
[4]  
Blouin J., 2014, CESifo Working Paper 4695
[5]   The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms [J].
Buettner, Thiess ;
Overesch, Michael ;
Schreiber, Ulrich ;
Wamser, Georg .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (11-12) :930-938
[6]  
Chowdhry B.e., 1998, Journal of Corporate Finance, V4, P87
[7]  
Chowdhry Bhagwan., 1994, J CORP FINANC, V1, P259
[8]  
Clark Jr W, 2016, ESTABLISHING BUSINES
[9]   A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets [J].
Desai, MA ;
Foley, CF ;
Hines, JR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (06) :2451-2487
[10]   Corporate taxation, debt financing and foreign-plant ownership [J].
Egger, Peter ;
Eggert, Wolfgang ;
Keuschnigg, Christian ;
Winner, Hannes .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 54 (01) :96-107