Comprehensive DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers for Thyroid Cancer

被引:28
|
作者
Park, Jong-Lyul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jeon, Sora [4 ,7 ]
Seo, Eun-Hye [1 ,3 ]
Bae, Dong Hyuck [1 ,3 ]
Jeong, Young Mun [4 ]
Kim, Yourha [4 ,7 ]
Bae, Ja Seong [5 ,7 ]
Kim, Seon-Kyu [3 ]
Jung, Chan Kwon [6 ,7 ]
Kim, Yong Sung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Res Inst Biosci & Biotechnol, Genome Editing Res Ctr, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[2] Korea Res Inst Biosci & Biotechnol, Personalized Genom Med Res Ctr, Daejeon, South Korea
[3] Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Funct Genom, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Biomed & Hlth Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Hosp Pathol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Catholic Univ Korea, Canc Res Inst, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
DNA methylation; thyroid neoplasms; methylation markers; NIFTP; papillary thyroid cancer; recurrence; FOLLICULAR VARIANT; CPG SITES; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; HYPOMETHYLATION; VALIDATION; MICROARRAY; NEOPLASM; FEATURES; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.1089/thy.2019.0011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There are no reliable biomarkers to accurately differentiate indolent thyroid tumors from more aggressive thyroid cancers. This study aimed to develop new DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and recurrence risk stratification of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods: Thyroid tumor-specific DNA methylation profiling was investigated in 34 fresh frozen tissues, which included nontumor (n = 7), noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP, n = 6) and PTC (n = 21), using the Illumina HumanMethylation EPIC array. We performed a genome-wide assessment of thyroid tumor-specific differentially methylated CpG sites in the discovery set, then validated the top candidate markers in an independent set of 293 paraffin tissue samples comprised of follicular adenoma (FA, n = 61), Hurthle cell adenoma (HA, n = 24), NIFTP (n = 56), PTC (n = 120), follicular thyroid carcinoma (n = 27), and Hurthle cell carcinoma (n = 5), by pyrosequencing. Results: Three selected markers (cg10705422, cg17707274, and cg26849382) differentiated nonmalignant (FA, HA, and NIFTP) tumors from differentiated thyroid cancers with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83, 0.83, and 0.80, respectively. Low DNA methylation levels for three markers were significantly associated with recurrent or persistent disease (odds ratio (OR) = 3.860 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.194-12.475]) and distant metastasis (OR = 4.009 [CI 1.098-14.632]) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. A subgroup analysis for the validation set showed that PTC patients with low DNA methylation levels more frequently had aggressive histology, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, BRAF(V600E) mutations, and recurrent or persistent disease than those with high levels of methylation markers. All PTC patients who developed disease recurrence had low DNA methylation levels for three markers. Conclusions: DNA methylation levels of three markers can be useful for differentiating differentiated thyroid cancer from nonmalignant follicular thyroid lesions, and may serve as prognostic biomarkers for predicting recurrent or persistent disease after surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 203
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Roadmap of DNA methylation in breast cancer identifies novel prognostic biomarkers
    de Almeida, Bernardo P.
    Apolonio, Joana Dias
    Binnie, Alexandra
    Castelo-Branco, Pedro
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [2] DNA methylation profiling reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma
    Lasseigne, Brittany N.
    Burwell, Todd C.
    Patil, Mohini A.
    Absher, Devin M.
    Brooks, James D.
    Myers, Richard M.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2014, 12
  • [3] MicroRNA Profile for Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer
    Park, Jong-Lyul
    Kim, Seon-Kyu
    Jeon, Sora
    Jung, Chan-Kwon
    Kim, Yong-Sung
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 19
  • [4] Potential of DNA methylation in rectal cancer as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers
    Exner, Ruth
    Pulverer, Walter
    Diem, Martina
    Spaller, Lisa
    Woltering, Laura
    Schreiber, Martin
    Wolf, Brigitte
    Sonntagbauer, Markus
    Schroeder, Fabian
    Stift, Judith
    Wrba, Fritz
    Bergmann, Michael
    Weinhaeusel, Andreas
    Egger, Gerda
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 113 (07) : 1035 - 1045
  • [5] Roadmap of DNA methylation in breast cancer identifies novel prognostic biomarkers
    Bernardo P. de Almeida
    Joana Dias Apolónio
    Alexandra Binnie
    Pedro Castelo-Branco
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [6] DNA methylation profiling reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma
    Brittany N Lasseigne
    Todd C Burwell
    Mohini A Patil
    Devin M Absher
    James D Brooks
    Richard M Myers
    BMC Medicine, 12
  • [7] Comprehensive DNA methylation profiling by MeDIP-NGS identifies potential genes and pathways for epithelial ovarian cancer
    Gautam, Priyanka
    Gupta, Sameer
    Sachan, Manisha
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [8] DNA methylation profiling analysis identifies a DNA methylation signature for predicting prognosis and recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma
    Wang, Rui
    Zhu, Hong
    Yang, Mingxia
    Zhu, Chunrong
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 18 (06) : 5831 - 5842
  • [9] Integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression through machine learning identifies stomach cancer diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers
    Hosseini, Maryam
    Lotfi-Shahreza, Maryam
    Nikpour, Parvaneh
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 27 (05) : 714 - 726
  • [10] Integrative genome-wide expression and promoter DNA methylation profiling identifies a potential novel panel of ovarian cancer epigenetic biomarkers
    Gloss, Brian S.
    Patterson, Kate I.
    Barton, Caroline A.
    Gonzalez, Maria
    Scurry, James P.
    Hacker, Neville F.
    Sutherland, Robert L.
    O'Brien, Philippa M.
    Clark, Susan J.
    CANCER LETTERS, 2012, 318 (01) : 76 - 85