A scoping review of medical education research in family medicine

被引:33
作者
Webster, Fiona [1 ]
Krueger, Paul [1 ]
MacDonald, Heather [2 ]
Archibald, Douglas [3 ]
Telner, Deanna [1 ]
Bytautas, Jessica [4 ]
Whitehead, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Hlth & BioSci, Reference Serv, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Dept Family Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
来源
BMC Medical Education | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Medical education research; Family medicine; Scoping review; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; PRIMARY-CARE; HEALTH; QUALITY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-015-0350-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Little is known about the state of education research within family medicine. As family medicine education models develop, it is important to develop an understanding of the current state of this research and develop ways to advance the field. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of family medicine education research to describe 1) research topic areas and 2) the methodologies and methods used to study these topics. MEDLINE, Social Sciences Abstracts and ERIC electronic databases were searched. 817 full text articles from 2002 to 2012 were screened; 624 articles were included in the review. Results: The following research topic areas were identified: continuing education, curriculum development, undergraduate education, teaching methods, assessment techniques, selection of entrants, non-clinical skills, professional and faculty development, clinical decision-making and resident well-being. Quantitative studies comprised the large majority of research approaches; overall minimal methodological details were provided. Conclusions: Our review highlights an overall need for increased sophisticated in methodological approaches to education research in family medicine, a problem that could be ameliorated by multiple strategies including better engagement of methodologists throughout the research process. The results provide guidance for future family medicine education research programs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Research in medical education: Balancing service and science
    Albert, Mathieu
    Hodges, Brian
    Regehr, Glenn
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2007, 12 (01) : 103 - 115
  • [2] [Anonymous], IMPLEMENTING PRIMARY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, FDN SOCIAL RES
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, QUALITATIVE RES HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119410867
  • [5] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • [6] Research paradigms in medical education research
    Bunniss, Suzanne
    Kelly, Diane R.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (04) : 358 - 366
  • [7] Medical education research: Challenges and opportunities
    Collins, Jannette
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (03) : 639 - 647
  • [8] Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education
    Cook, David A.
    Bordage, Georges
    Schmidt, Henk G.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (02) : 128 - 133
  • [9] Mastery Learning for Health Professionals Using Technology-Enhanced Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Brydges, Ryan
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    Hatala, Rose
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2013, 88 (08) : 1178 - 1186
  • [10] Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review
    Cook, Davin A.
    Beckman, Thomas J.
    Bordage, Georges
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (08) : 737 - 745