Remifentanil-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy:: a randomized trial

被引:49
作者
Gerlach, K
Uhlig, T
Hüppe, M
Nowak, G
Schmitz, A
Saager, L
Grasteit, A
Schmucker, P
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Lubeck, Anasthesiol Klin, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Lubeck, Dept Neurosurg, Lubeck, Germany
关键词
anaesthesia and analgesia; anaesthesia recovery period; anaesthesia general; anaesthetics intravenous; propofol; remifentanil; sufentanil; signs and symptoms; nausea; pain; vomiting;
D O I
10.1097/00003643-200310000-00007
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Remifentanil has unique pharmacokinetics that might allow faster recovery after neurosurgery. We investigated the effects of a propofol/sufentanit versus a remifentanil/propofol regimen on the primary end-point tracheal extubation time. Methods: In the Neurosurgery Department of a University Hospital, 36 patients awaiting craniotomy for supratentorial turnout resection were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. In the sufentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was induced with 0.5 mug kg(-1) sufentanil and 1-2 mg kg(-1) propofol. Propofol infusion and boluses of sufentanil were administered for maintenance. In the remifentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was started with an infusion of remifentanil (0.2-0.35 mug kg(-1) min(-1)) and a bolus of propofol (1.5-2 mg kg(-1)). Patients received a propofol infusion and a remifentanil infusion for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery times were taken from cessation of the propofol infusion. In addition, data about self-reported nausea and vomiting, pain and analgesic requirements were collected. Results: Patients in the remifentanil/propofol group were extubated earlier (mean times 6.4 (+/-SD 4.7) versus 14.3 (+/-9.2) min; P = 0.003). The two groups were similar with respect to postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient-reported pain scores. Fifty per cent of the remifentanil/propofol patients and 8896 of the sufentanil/propofol patients required no analgesics within 1 h after operation (P =0.03). Conclusions: The remifentanil/propofol regimen provided quicker recovery. The two regimens were similar in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient-reported pain scores, but patients in the remifentanil/ propofol group required more analgesics within 1 h postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 820
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Intact cerebral blood flow reactivity during remifentanil nitrous oxide anesthesia [J].
Baker, KZ ;
Ostapkovich, N ;
Sisti, MB ;
Warner, DS ;
Young, WL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 9 (02) :134-140
[2]   A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions [J].
Balakrishnan, G ;
Raudzens, P ;
Samra, SK ;
Song, K ;
Boening, JA ;
Bosek, V ;
Jamerson, BD ;
Warner, DS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (01) :163-169
[3]   Metabolic and hemodynamic changes during recovery and tracheal extubation in neurosurgical patients: Immediate versus delayed recovery [J].
Bruder, N ;
Stordeur, JM ;
Ravussin, P ;
Valli, M ;
Dufour, H ;
Bruguerolle, B ;
Francois, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (03) :674-678
[4]   BRAIN AND SPINAL-CORD METABOLIC-ACTIVITY DURING PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA [J].
CAVAZZUTI, M ;
PORRO, CA ;
BARBIERI, A ;
GALETTI, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (04) :490-495
[5]  
Coriat P, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1081
[6]   Postoperative pain in neurosurgery: A pilot study in brain surgery [J].
DeBenedittis, G ;
Lorenzetti, A ;
Migliore, M ;
Spagnoli, D ;
Tiberio, F ;
Villani, RM .
NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 38 (03) :466-469
[7]   Intraoperative awareness in fast-track cardiac anesthesia [J].
Dowd, NP ;
Cheng, DCH ;
Karski, JM ;
Wong, DT ;
Munro, JAC ;
Sandler, AN .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (05) :1068-1073
[8]   ANESTHESIA FOR CRANIOTOMY - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ALFENTANIL, FENTANYL, AND SUFENTANIL [J].
FROM, RP ;
WARNER, DS ;
TODD, MM ;
SOKOLL, MD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (05) :896-904
[9]  
GLASS PSA, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P1031
[10]  
Gobel H, 1988, Schmerz, V2, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF02527918