Testing Similarity Effects with Dyadic Response Surface Analysis

被引:122
作者
Schoenbrodt, Felix D. [1 ]
Humberg, Sarah [2 ]
Nestler, Steffen [3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, Leopoldstr 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Westfalische Wilhelms Univ Munster, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
congruence; similarity; dyadic data; response surface analysis; polynomial regression; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; PERSONALITY SIMILARITY; MULTIMODEL INFERENCE; SOCIAL-CONSEQUENCES; DIFFERENCE SCORES; POWERFUL APPROACH; MODEL SELECTION; MISSING DATA; PARTNER;
D O I
10.1002/per.2169
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dyadic similarity effect hypotheses state that the (dis)similarity between dyad members (e.g. the similarity on a personality dimension) is related to a dyadic outcome variable (e.g. the relationship satisfaction of both partners). Typically, these hypotheses have been investigated by using difference scores or other profile similarity indices as predictors of the outcome variables. These approaches, however, have been vigorously criticized for their conceptual and statistical shortcomings. Here, we introduce a statistical method that is based on polynomial regression and addresses most of these shortcomings: dyadic response surface analysis. This model is tailored for similarity effect hypotheses and fully accounts for the dyadic nature of relationship data. Furthermore, we provide a tutorial with an illustrative example and reproducible R and Mplus scripts that should assist substantive researchers in precisely formulating, testing, and interpreting their dyadic similarity effect hypotheses. (c) 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 641
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Ackerman RA., 2016, APIMPowerR: An interactive tool for actor-partner interdependence model power analysis
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]  
[Anonymous], R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOCIOL METHOD RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Testing fit patterns with polynomial regression models
[6]   The Social Consequences of Personality: Six Suggestions for Future Research [J].
Back, Mitja D. ;
Vazire, Simine .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2015, 29 (02) :296-307
[7]   How to Test Questions About Similarity in Personality and Social Psychology Research: Description and Empirical Demonstration of Response Surface Analysis [J].
Barranti, Maxwell ;
Carlson, Erika N. ;
Cote, Stephane .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2017, 8 (04) :465-475
[8]   THE OPTIMAL MARGIN OF ILLUSION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 8 (02) :176-189
[9]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[10]   Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction [J].
Blanton, H ;
Jaccard, J ;
Gonzales, PM ;
Christe, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (02) :192-212