Clinical validation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology triage of HPV-positive women: Results from the IMPACT trial

被引:36
作者
Wright, Thomas C., Jr. [1 ]
Stoler, Mark H. [2 ]
Ranger-Moore, Jim [3 ]
Fang, Qijun [4 ]
Volkir, Patrick [4 ]
Safaeian, Mahboobeh [5 ]
Ridder, Ruediger [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Pathol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Ventana Med Syst Inc, Roche Tissue Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Roche Mol Solut Inc, Pleasanton, CA USA
[5] Roche Mol Syst Inc, Pleasanton, CA USA
关键词
cervical cancer; HPV testing; p16; Ki-67; dual-stain; MANAGEMENT CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; ATHENA;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.33812
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Triage strategies are needed for primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening to identify women requiring colposcopy/biopsy. We assessed the performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained (DS) immunocytochemistry to triage HPV-positive women and compared it to cytology, with or without HPV16/18 genotyping. A prospective observational screening study enrolled 35 263 women aged 25 to 65 years at 32 U.S. sites. Cervical samples had HPV and cytology testing, with colposcopy/biopsy for women with positive tests. Women without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2 or worse (>= CIN2) at baseline (n = 3876) were retested after 1 year. In all, 4927 HPV-positive women with valid DS results were included in this analysis. DS sensitivity for >= CIN2 and >= CIN3 at baseline was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8%-94.2%) and 91.9% (95% CI: 86.1%-95.4%), respectively, in HPV16/18-positive women and 83.0% (95% CI: 78.4%-86.8%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 77.5%-91.6%) in women with 12 "other" genotypes. Using DS alone to triage HPV-positive women showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology triage of 12 "other" genotypes, and substantially higher sensitivity but lower specificity than using cytology alone. The risk of >= CIN2 was significantly lower in HPV-positive, DS-negative women (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.9%-4.4%), compared to triage-negative women using HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology for 12 "other" genotypes (7.4%; 95% CI: 6.4%-8.5%; P < .0001) or cytology alone (7.5%; 95% CI: 6.7%-8.4%; P < .0001). DS showed better risk stratification than cytology-based strategies and provided high reassurance against pre-cancers both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up, irrespective of the HPV genotype. DS allows for the safe triage of primary screening HPV-positive women.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 471
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening: Review of p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining as a Promising Triage Strategy
    Ouh, Yung-Taek
    Kim, Ho Yeon
    Yi, Kyong Wook
    Lee, Nak-Woo
    Kim, Hai-Joong
    Min, Kyung-Jin
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [22] A systematic review of p16/Ki-67 immuno-testing for triage of low grade cervical cytology
    Kisser, A.
    Zechmeister-Koss, I.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [23] Evaluation of the clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining cytology for cervical lesion detection in premenopausal and postmenopausal Chinese women
    Yu Dai
    Tingting Chen
    Xinyue Li
    Changning Zhang
    Tingyuan Li
    Yuqian Zhao
    Yakun Wang
    Simiao Chen
    Lulu Yu
    Mingyue Jiang
    Zeni Wu
    Jinghong Yang
    Wen Chen
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 10645 - 10658
  • [24] p16/Ki-67 dual labeling and urinary cytology results according to the New Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: Impact of extended follow-up
    Piaton, Eric
    Advenier, Anne-Sophie
    Carre, Christian
    Decaussin-Petrucci, Myriam
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Hutin, Karine
    Nennig, Cindy
    Colombel, Marc
    Ruffion, Alain
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 125 (07) : 552 - 562
  • [25] Interobserver Reproducibility and Accuracy of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stain Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Fetterman, Barbara
    Tokugawa, Diane
    Schiffman, Mark
    Castle, Philip E.
    Wood, Shannon N.
    Stiemerling, Eric
    Poitras, Nancy
    Lorey, Thomas
    Kinney, Walter
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (12) : 914 - 920
  • [26] Clinical Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Screening With p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Triage in a Large Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Clarke, Megan A.
    Bremer, Renee
    Poitras, Nancy
    Tokugawa, Diane
    Goldhoff, Patricia E.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Schiffman, Mark
    Kingery, Julie D.
    Grewal, Kiranjit K.
    Locke, Alex
    Kinney, Walter
    Lorey, Thomas S.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 881 - 888
  • [27] Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy
    Gajsek, Ursula Salobir
    Dovnik, Andraz
    Takac, Iztok
    Ivanus, Urska
    Jerman, Tine
    Zatler, Simona Sramek
    Fokter, Alenka Repse
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [28] Significance of Triple Detection of p16/ki-67 Dual-Staining, Liquid-Based Cytology and HR HPV Testing in Screening of Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study
    Yu, Li
    Chen, Xun
    Liu, Xubin
    Fei, Lingyan
    Ma, Hanyu
    Tian, Tian
    Wang, Liantang
    Chen, Shangwu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [29] p16INK4a overexpression and p16/Ki-67 dual labeling versus conventional urinary cytology in the evaluation of urothelial carcinoma
    Piaton, Eric
    Carre, Christian
    Advenier, Anne-Sophie
    Decaussin-Petrucci, Myriam
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Lantier, Philippe
    Granier, Guillaume
    Ruffion, Alain
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (03) : 211 - 220
  • [30] Performance of P16/Ki67 dual staining in triaging hr-HPV-positive population during cervical Cancer screening in the younger women
    Qian, Qiu-Ping
    Zhang, Xiaoan
    Ding, Bo
    Jiang, Shi-Wen
    Li, Ze-Min
    Ren, Mu-Lan
    Shen, Yang
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2018, 483 : 281 - 285