A simplified technique for nerve-sparing type III radical hysterectomy By reorganizing their surgical sequence, surgeons could more easily identify key nerves

被引:17
作者
Charoenkwan, Kittipat [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
cervical cancer; nerve preservation; nerve-sparing; pelvic lymphadenectomy; radical hysterectomy; PELVIC AUTONOMIC NERVES; CERVICAL-CANCER; IDENTIFICATION; PRESERVATION; DYSFUNCTIONS; BLADDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was developed in an attempt to minimize complications, including bladder, colorectal, and sexual dysfunction which are associated with disruption of the pelvic autonomic nerves during resection of the parametrium. In this article, the author proposes a simple, effective technique for identification and preservation of the pelvic nerves during type III radical hysterectomy. The essential technical considerations include the sequential approach to parametrial resection, starting from the posterior part, the direct visualization of the main nerve trunks at all sites during parametrial resection, and the avoidance of direct manipulation and unnecessary dissection of the nerves. Operative outcomes of 22 patients with cervical or uterine cancer who underwent type III radical hysterectomy from August 2008 to March 2010 were reviewed. Comparing with the earlier method performed at the author's institution, the present technique was associated with an increased proportion of patients who had a postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) under 50 mL at postoperative day 7 (55% vs 27%) and a shorter median duration before this PVR was reached (7 days vs 9 days). The systematic approach proposed in this article would make the nerve-sparing technique for radical hysterectomy more straightforward and applicable to various settings. A thorough understanding of anatomy and adequate surgical skills are always vital components of successful nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:600.e1 / 600.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves [J].
Maas, CP ;
Kenter, GG ;
Trimbos, JB ;
Deruiter, MC .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (09) :868-874
[12]   Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective [J].
Mass, CP ;
Trimbos, JB ;
DeRuiter, MC ;
van de Velde, CJH ;
Kenter, GG .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2003, 48 (03) :271-279
[13]   Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III [J].
Possover, M ;
Stöber, S ;
Plaul, K ;
Schneider, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 79 (02) :154-157
[14]   Type II versus Type III Nerve-sparing Radical hysterectomy: Comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions [J].
Raspagliesi, Francesco ;
Ditto, Antonino ;
Fontanelli, Rosanna ;
Zanaboni, Flavia ;
Solima, Eugenio ;
Spatti, Glanbattista ;
Hanozet, Francesco ;
Vecchione, Francesca ;
Rossi, Gabriella ;
Kusamura, Shigeki .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 102 (02) :256-262
[15]   A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function [J].
Sakuragi, N ;
Todo, Y ;
Kudo, M ;
Yamamoto, R ;
Sato, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 (02) :389-397
[16]   Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: Harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection [J].
Yabuki, Y ;
Sasaki, H ;
Hatakeyama, N ;
Murakami, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) :7-15
[17]   A new proposal for radical hysterectomy [J].
Yabuki, Y ;
Asamoto, A ;
Hoshiba, T ;
Nishimoto, H ;
Satou, N .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (03) :370-378
[18]   Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review [J].
Zullo, MA ;
Manci, N ;
Angioli, R ;
Muzii, L ;
Panici, PB .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2003, 48 (03) :287-293