Effect of noncancerous pelvic problems on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning

被引:38
作者
Kuppermann, Miriam
Learman, Lee A.
Schembri, Michael
Gregorich, Steven
Jacoby, Alison
Jackson, Rebecca A.
Gates, Elena
Wassel-Fyr, Christina
Lewis, James
Washington, A. Eugene
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Med Effectiveness Res Ctr Diverse Populat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000279153.56275.b5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic pain and pressure on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning and assess treatment satisfaction. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 1,493 socio-demographically diverse women who were seeking care for noncancerous pelvic problems and who had not undergone hysterectomy. Participants were asked about symptoms, attitudes, health-related quality of life, sexual functioning, and treatment satisfaction. Preference for current health was measured using the time tradeoff metric, which asked respondents to estimate the number of years of life they would be willing to trade off to not have a uterine condition. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify determinants of treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Most (82.7%) participants reported a complete lack of or only partial symptom resolution, and 42.3% reported that their pelvic problems interfered with their ability to have and enjoy sex. Mean Short Form-12 Physical (43-49) and Mental (41-44) Component Summary scores were substantially lower than population norms for women aged 40-49 years. Mean current health time tradeoff scores ranged from 0.78 to 0.88. Satisfaction with Western medicines ranged from 31.3% (progestin intrauterine device) to 58.2% (opiates) and with uterinepreserving,surgery from 20.0% (dilation and curettage) to 51.0% (myomectomy); 27.7% of the women who used acupuncture were satisfied. Participants with lower educational attainment, greater symptom resolution, and less interference of pelvic problems with sex were more likely to be satisfied. CONCLUSION: Noncancerous pelvic problems are associated with serious decrements in health-related quality of life and sexual functioning and low rates of treatment satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 642
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allison P., 2002, MISSING DATA
[2]   PERFORMANCE OF A 5-ITEM MENTAL-HEALTH SCREENING-TEST [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
MURPHY, JM ;
GOLDMAN, PA ;
WARE, JE ;
BARSKY, AJ ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (02) :169-176
[3]   The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy [J].
Broder, MS ;
Kanouse, DE ;
Mittman, BS ;
Bernstein, SJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (02) :199-205
[4]   THE MAINE-WOMENS-HEALTH-STUDY .1. OUTCOMES OF HYSTERECTOMY [J].
CARLSON, KJ ;
MILLER, BA ;
FOWLER, FJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (04) :556-565
[5]  
Cooper KG, 2001, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V108, P1222, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00275.x
[6]   Endometrial resection versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia: Long-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes [J].
Crosignani, PG ;
Vercellini, P ;
Apolone, G ;
DeGiorgi, O ;
Cortesi, I ;
Meschia, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (01) :95-101
[7]  
DeFrances Carol J, 2004, Adv Data, P1
[8]  
Edwards RD, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P360
[9]   BASE-LINE QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT IN THE NATIONAL SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST AND BOWEL PROJECT BREAST-CANCER PREVENTION TRIAL [J].
GANZ, PA ;
DAY, R ;
WARE, JE ;
REDMOND, C ;
FISHER, B .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (18) :1372-1382
[10]   Patient-derived health state utilities for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Gerson, LB ;
Ullah, N ;
Hastie, T ;
Triadafilopoulos, G ;
Goldstein, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (03) :524-533