A new optimization method using a compressed sensing inspired solver for real-time LDR-brachytherapy treatment planning

被引:14
作者
Guthier, C. [1 ]
Aschenbrenner, K. P. [1 ]
Buergy, D. [2 ]
Ehmann, M. [2 ]
Wenz, F. [2 ]
Hesser, J. W. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Expt Radiat Oncol, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, IWR, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
brachytherapy; LDR; inverse treatment planning; compressed sensing; real-time; PROSTATE-CANCER; ADJOINT FUNCTIONS; SEED IMPLANT; TEMPLATE; THERAPY; PURSUIT; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2179
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work discusses a novel strategy for inverse planning in low dose rate brachytherapy. It applies the idea of compressed sensing to the problem of inverse treatment planning and a new solver for this formulation is developed. An inverse planning algorithm was developed incorporating brachytherapy dose calculation methods as recommended by AAPM TG-43. For optimization of the functional a new variant of a matching pursuit type solver is presented. The results are compared with current state-of-the-art inverse treatment planning algorithms by means of real prostate cancer patient data. The novel strategy outperforms the best state-of-the-art methods in speed, while achieving comparable quality. It is able to find solutions with comparable values for the objective function and it achieves these results within a few microseconds, being up to 542 times faster than competing state-of-the-art strategies, allowing real-time treatment planning. The sparse solution of inverse brachytherapy planning achieved with methods from compressed sensing is a new paradigm for optimization in medical physics. Through the sparsity of required needles and seeds identified by this method, the cost of intervention may be reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:2179 / 2194
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Optimization of HDR brachytherapy dose distributions using linear programming with penalty costs [J].
Alterovitz, Ron ;
Lessard, Etienne ;
Pouliot, Jean ;
Hsu, I-Chow Joe ;
O'Brien, James F. ;
Goldberg, Ken .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (11) :4012-4019
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 27 ASILOMAR C SIGNAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], MATLAB VERS 8 1 0 R2
[4]   Precedence for prostate brachytherapy [J].
Aronowitz, Jesse N. ;
Grimard, Laval ;
Robison, Roger .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2011, 10 (03) :201-207
[5]  
Baltas D, 2006, HDB OPTIMIZATION OPT, V1.1, P1
[6]   COMPUTERIZED OPTIMIZATION OF I125 IMPLANTS IN BRAIN-TUMORS [J].
BAUERKIRPES, B ;
STURM, V ;
SCHLEGEL, W ;
LORENZ, WJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 14 (05) :1013-1023
[7]   Prostate cancer epidemiology in the United States [J].
Brawley, Otis W. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) :195-200
[8]   International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates [J].
Center, Melissa M. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Lortet-Tieulent, Joannie ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Brawley, Otis ;
Bray, Freddie .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (06) :1079-1092
[9]   Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit [J].
Chen, SSB ;
Donoho, DL ;
Saunders, MA .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 1998, 20 (01) :33-61
[10]   An iterative sequential mixed-integer approach to automated prostate brachytherapy treatment plan optimization [J].
D'Souza, WD ;
Meyer, RR ;
Thomadsen, BR ;
Ferris, MC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (02) :297-322