Azimuthal variation in seismic anisotropy of the southern California uppermost mantle

被引:18
作者
Davis, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90065 USA
关键词
seismic anisotropy; southern California; upper mantle;
D O I
10.1029/2001JB000637
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
[1] The Backus [1965] theory of seismic anisotropy is used to obtain expressions for the velocities and polarizations of quasi-P and S waves for rays making small angles to the symmetry axes of an orthorhombic elastic tensor. Expressions are found for P wave polarization and S wave splitting parameters as a function of incidence angle theta and azimuth z. For small theta, splitting and P wave velocity exhibit predominantly a two z variation. P wave velocity squared is given by v(p)(2) = v(0)(2) + c(1)theta(2) + c(2)cos(2z)theta(2), where the c(i) are combinations of coefficients of the elasticity tensor. The eigenvalues corresponding to the fast and slow S waves are given by similar expressions. Variation in P wave horizontal polarization exhibits a 2z variation; deltaz(p) = -Delta(z) sin(2z) with little dependence on theta. SKKS and SKS splitting parameters exhibit an azimuthal variation given by phi = phi(0) + d(1) sin(2z)theta(2) and deltat = deltat(0) + e(1)theta(2) + e(2) cos(2z)theta(2), where phi is the fast direction and deltat is the time delay. We report 2z variation in splitting parameters at the Global Seismic Network stations in southern California. We use other estimates of seismic anisotropy to invert for depth-averaged values of the elasticity tensor. The resulting tensor adequately describes azimuthal variation in P wave horizontal polarization [Schulte-Pelkum et al., 2001], P-n, Rayleigh and Love wave velocities, as well as SKKS and SKS splitting, suggesting they all arise from a common source of anisotropy in the upper 200 km of the mantle.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Aki K., 1980, QUANTITATIVE SEISMOL, VII
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB PHYS CONSTANT AM, DOI DOI 10.1029/RF002P0064
[3]   POSSIBLE FORMS OF SEISMIC ANISOTROPY OF UPPERMOST MANTLE UNDER OCEANS [J].
BACKUS, GE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1965, 70 (14) :3429-+
[4]   P-WAVE ARRAY POLARIZATION ANALYSIS AND EFFECTIVE ANISOTROPY OF THE BRITTLE CRUST [J].
BOKELMANN, GHR .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 120 (01) :145-162
[5]  
Cerveny V., 1982, Contr. Geophys. Inst. Slov. Acad. Sci., V13, P127
[6]   REVIEW OF EFFECTS OF ANISOTROPIC LAYERING ON PROPAGATION OF SEISMIC-WAVES [J].
CRAMPIN, S .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1977, 49 (01) :9-27
[7]   AN INTRODUCTION TO WAVE-PROPAGATION IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA [J].
CRAMPIN, S .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1984, 76 (01) :17-28
[8]   A REVIEW OF WAVE MOTION IN ANISOTROPIC AND CRACKED ELASTIC-MEDIA [J].
CRAMPIN, S .
WAVE MOTION, 1981, 3 (04) :343-391
[9]   PRELIMINARY REFERENCE EARTH MODEL [J].
DZIEWONSKI, AM ;
ANDERSON, DL .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1981, 25 (04) :297-356
[10]   EARLY STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION AND ANISOTROPY OF OCEANIC UPPER MANTLE [J].
FORSYTH, DW .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1975, 43 (01) :103-162