The influence of liquid plant additives on the anthropogenic gas emissions from the combustion of coal-water slurries

被引:28
作者
Nyashina, G. S. [1 ]
Strizhak, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Tomsk Polytech Univ, Tomsk 634050, Russia
关键词
Coal-water slurries; Coal and oil processing wastes; Plant additives and dopes; Combustion; Anthropogenic gas emissions; Complex criterion; DIESEL-ENGINE; SINGLE DROPLETS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; PINE OIL; FUEL; PERFORMANCE; BIODIESEL; BIOMASS; COCOMBUSTION; IGNITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.072
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At present, coal is considered one of the main components for the production of cheap, high-energy and environmentally attractive slurry fuels. The latter can be produced on the basis of low-grade coal dust or coal processing wastes. Thus, coal-water slurries and coal-water slurries containing petrochemicals are produced. The involvement of coal and oil processing wastes expands the scope of raw materials, reduces the fuel costs from traditional energy sources and modifies the main economic characteristics of power plant performance. However, it also increases the impact of coal-fired thermal power stations on the environment. In the last 30-50 years, many efforts have been made to decrease the negative impact of human industrial activity on climate. Involving plant-based components in the process of energy generation to save energy and material resources looks very promising nowadays. This research studies the influence of adding typical bioliquids (bioethanol, turpentine, glycerol) on the concentration of anthropogenic emissions from coal-water slurry combustion. Relative mass concentrations of bioliquids varied in a small range below 20%. We focused on the concentration of the most hazardous sulfur and nitrogen oxides from the combustion of typical filter cakes, as well as plant-containing slurries. It was established that the concentration of sulfur oxides can be decreased (as compared to coal) by 75%, whereas that of nitrogen oxides by almost 30%. Using a generalizing criteria expression, we illustrated the main benefits of adding bioliquids to slurry fuels in comparison with coal. Adding 20% of glycerol was found to provide maximum advantages. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Alekseenko SV, 2017, BULL TOMSK POLYTECH, V328, P16
  • [2] Co-combustion of coal and olive oil industry residues in fluidised bed
    Armesto, L
    Bahillo, A
    Cabanillas, A
    Veijonen, K
    Otero, J
    Plumed, A
    Salvador, L
    [J]. FUEL, 2003, 82 (08) : 993 - 1000
  • [3] The evolution of the biofuel science
    Azadi, Pooya
    Malina, Robert
    Barrett, Steven R. H.
    Kraft, Markus
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 : 1479 - 1484
  • [4] Oxidation of CO by SO2:: A theoretical study
    Bacskay, GB
    Mackie, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2005, 109 (09) : 2019 - 2025
  • [5] An investigation of the evaporation behavior of bioliquid in the pores and its application to hybrid coal combining biomass with coal
    Bae, Jong-Soo
    Lee, Dong-Wook
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Park, Se-Joon
    Park, Ju-Hyoung
    Kim, Joeng-Geun
    Han, Choon
    Choi, Young-Chan
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 90 : 199 - 206
  • [6] BP, 2016, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
  • [7] Clean coal technology development in China
    Chen, Wenying
    Xu, Ruina
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) : 2123 - 2130
  • [8] Coal as a promising source of critical elements: Progress and future prospects
    Dai, Shifeng
    Finkelman, Robert B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2018, 186 : 155 - 164
  • [9] Fuel additive technology - NOx reduction, combustion efficiency and fly ash improvement for coal fired power stations
    Daood, S. S.
    Ord, G.
    Wilkinson, T.
    Nimmo, W.
    [J]. FUEL, 2014, 134 : 293 - 306
  • [10] Major gas emissions from combustion of slurry fuels based on coal, coal waste, and coal derivatives
    Dmitrienko, Margarita A.
    Nyashina, Galina S.
    Strizhak, Pavel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 284 - 301