Psychometric Properties of the Hip-Return to Sport After Injury Scale (Short Form) for Evaluating Psychological Readiness to Return to Sports After Arthroscopic Hip Surgery

被引:12
作者
Jones, Denise M. [1 ,2 ]
Webster, Kate E. [1 ,2 ]
Crossley, Kay M. [1 ,2 ]
Ackerman, Ilana N. [1 ,3 ]
Hart, Harvi F. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Singh, Parminder J. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Pritchard, Michael G. [1 ,6 ]
Gamboa, Gauguin [1 ,7 ]
Kemp, Joanne L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Coll Sci Hlth & Engn, Sch Allied Hlth, La Trobe Sport & Exercise Med Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Phys Therapy, London, ON, Canada
[5] Deakin Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Wellington Orthopaed, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[7] Brisbane Private Hosp, Queensland Hips & Knees, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
hip arthroscopy; psychological readiness; return to sports; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; OUTCOME MEASURES; VALIDATION; IMPACT; PAIN; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/0363546519888644
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Successful return to sports activity after surgery requires both physical and psychological readiness. The Hip-Return to Sport After Injury (Short Form) has been developed to assess psychological readiness to return to sports after hip injury and hip surgery, including hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the scale for a cohort of patients after hip arthroscopy with a range of sports participation levels. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Invitations to participate were sent to 145 patients from 3 specialist surgeons. The study included 77 participants 1 to 24 months after hip arthroscopy (mean +/- SD age, 35 +/- 9 years; 62% women) and 33 healthy age-matched controls (age, 37 +/- 7 years; 52% women). The scale was administered electronically on 3 occasions to patients: baseline (>= 1 month postarthroscopy), 1 week later, and 6 months later. In addition to the scale, participants were asked about sports participation status and their global rating of postsurgical change. The scale was administered to healthy controls on 1 occasion. The minimal detectable difference, discriminant validity, floor and ceiling effects, responsiveness, and interpretability (minimally important change) were determined for the scale. Results: Among the postarthroscopy group, excellent test-retest reliability was found (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.869; 95% CI, 0.756-0.932) with a minimal detectable difference of 26 points out of 100 at the individual level and 4 points out of 100 at the group level. At baseline discriminant validity was evident between those who had returned to sports (median = 69, n = 35) and those who had not returned to sports (median = 30, n = 42; Mann-Whitney U score = 232.5, z = -5.141, P < .001) and between the returned-to-sports postarthroscopy group and healthy controls (median = 96, n = 33; Mann-Whitney U score = 165.500, z = 5.666, P < .001). No floor or ceiling effects were evident. Responsiveness was demonstrated for the scale in relation to sports status. With sports status as an anchor, a minimally important change of 26 points was identified. Conclusion: Assessment of the Hip-Return to Sport After Injury (Short Form) supports its use as a reliable and valid measure of psychological readiness to return to sports in patients after hip arthroscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 384
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] 2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Glasgow, Philip
    Schneiders, Anthony
    Witvrouw, Erik
    Clarsen, Benjamin
    Cools, Ann
    Gojanovic, Boris
    Griffin, Steffan
    Khan, Karim M.
    Moksnes, Havard
    Mutch, Stephen A.
    Phillips, Nicola
    Reurink, Gustaaf
    Sadler, Robin
    Silbernagel, Karin Gravare
    Thorborg, Kristian
    Wangensteen, Arnlaug
    Wilk, Kevin E.
    Bizzini, Mario
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (14) : 853 - 864
  • [2] The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Ardern, Clare L.
    Osterberg, Annika
    Tagesson, Sofi
    Gauffin, Hakan
    Webster, Kate E.
    Kvist, Joanna
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 48 (22) : 1613 - U50
  • [3] Burgess T. L., 2011, South African Journal of Sports Medicine, V23, P138
  • [4] Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery
    Busija, Lucy
    Osborne, Richard H.
    Nilsdotter, Anna
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Roos, Ewa M.
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2008, 6 (1)
  • [5] Cicchetti D. V., 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENTS, V6, P284, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
  • [6] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, V2
  • [7] Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures - Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example
    de Vet, HCW
    Bouter, LM
    Bezemer, PD
    Beurskens, AJHM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 17 (04) : 479 - 487
  • [8] Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy: Aggregate Recommendations From High-volume Hip Arthroscopy Centers
    Domb, Benjamin G.
    Stake, Christine E.
    Finch, Nathan A.
    Cramer, T. Luke
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 37 (10) : E902 - E905
  • [9] An overview of some definitional issues for sports injury surveillance
    Finch, CF
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 1997, 24 (03) : 157 - 163
  • [10] Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
    Harris, Paul A.
    Taylor, Robert
    Thielke, Robert
    Payne, Jonathon
    Gonzalez, Nathaniel
    Conde, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 377 - 381