Heterogeneous impacts of research grant funding

被引:5
作者
Bloch, Carter [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Danish Ctr Studies Res & Res Policy CFA, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
research evaluation; heterogeneous treatment effects; citation impact; research grants; propensity score matching; EXCELLENCE; OUTPUT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/reseval/rvaa025
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to examine whether there is heterogeneity in the impacts of research grant funding, by examining whether before-after differences in citation impact are related to the past performance of grantees. Analysis of the heterogeneity in funding impacts can potentially inform the selection of awardees and the design of funding instruments and application and assessment procedures. We examine the impacts of research project grants awarded over the period from 2005 to 2008 from the Danish Council for Independent Research. For the matched sample of grantees and rejected applicants, mean before-after differences are significantly greater for grantees than rejected applicants. However, results are more mixed when comparing overall distributions instead of mean values, where results are either not significant or weakly significant at the 10% level. This suggests that grants lead to strong results for some but are much less for the majority of grantees. The analysis finds indications that citation impact of research grants is positively related to past research performance, thus providing indications of heterogeneity in grant effects. Additional work could be very useful in further exploring possible systematic relationships between other applicant characteristics, such as years of experience as a researcher and overall publication activity, and subsequent impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 468
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Nonparametric tests for treatment effect heterogeneity
    Crump, Richard K.
    Hotz, V. Joseph
    Imbens, Guido W.
    Mitnik, Oscar A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (03) : 389 - 405
  • [12] Causal effects in, nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
    Dehejia, RH
    Wahba, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (448) : 1053 - 1062
  • [13] Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies
    Dehejia, RH
    Wahba, S
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (01) : 151 - 161
  • [14] Heterogeneous impacts in PROGRESA
    Djebbari, Habiba
    Smith, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 145 (1-2) : 64 - 80
  • [15] Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    Miranda, Juan Jose
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 35 (03) : 356 - 379
  • [16] The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries
    Goek, Abdullah
    Rigby, John
    Shapira, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 67 (03) : 715 - 730
  • [17] Characterizing selection bias using experimental data
    Heckman, J
    Ichimura, H
    Smith, J
    Todd, P
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (05) : 1017 - 1098
  • [18] Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: Accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts
    Heckman, JJ
    Smith, J
    Clements, N
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) : 487 - 535
  • [19] Equity and Excellence in Research Funding
    Hicks, Diana
    Katz, J. Sylvan
    [J]. MINERVA, 2011, 49 (02) : 137 - 151
  • [20] Effects of large-scale research funding programs: a Japanese case study
    Ida, Takanori
    Fukuzawa, Naomi
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 94 (03) : 1253 - 1273