Increasing preoperative apnea severity improves upper airway stimulation response in OSA treatment

被引:9
|
作者
Evans, Sean S. [1 ]
Richman, Joshua [2 ]
Cho, Do-Yeon [1 ]
Withrow, Kirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Boshell Diabet Bldg 563,1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
Sleep apnea; obstructive sleep apnea; upper airway stimulation; hypoglossal nerve stimulator; CPAP-intolerant; sleep surgery; OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/lary.28009
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective Examine the patient characteristics of those undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for the treatment of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-refractive obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) at a tertiary care medical center to determine objective clinical predictors of success. Methods Retrospective chart review of the first 25 consecutive patients between August 2015 and December 2016 treated with UAS at a tertiary care academic center. Demographic data, medical and sleep history, pre- and postoperative polysomnography data, and sleep endoscopy findings were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided t test with bivariate and linear regression analysis. Results In our cohort of 25 patients, mean age was 67.5 +/- 7.6 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.2 +/- 3.8 kg/m2 with 42% female. One patient was excluded from analysis for unmasking of complete central apnea with therapy. AHI decreased by a mean of 33.8 events/hour following treatment (95% confidence interval: 25.8 to 41.7, P < 0.001). Preintervention AHI was associated with therapy response, with each point of preintervention AHI leading to an average decrease of 1.03 points (P < 0.001). Eighty-three percent of patients achieved a treatment AHI < 5, whereas 92% achieved an AHI < 10. Mean device use was 49.5 +/- 10.4 hours per week. Ninety-two percent of patients were discharged the day of surgery. No major adverse events occurred. Conclusion UAS continues to gain popularity for the treatment of CPAP-refractive OSA; therefore, identification of predictors of success is crucial. Our study, although small, suggests that more severe preintervention AHI does not preclude significant therapy response and may expand the inclusion criteria for UAS, meriting further investigation. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:556-560, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 560
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Upper Airway Stimulation in OSA
    Bender, B.
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2016, 95 (11) : 795 - 805
  • [2] OSA treatment history in an upper airway stimulation trial cohort
    Soose Ryan J.
    Padhya Tapan A.
    Gillespie M. Boyd
    Froymovich Oleg
    Lin Ho-sheng
    Woodson B. Tucker
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    Pittsburgh
    PA
    USA
    University of South Florida College of Medicine
    Tampa
    FL
    USA
    Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston
    SC
    USA
    Paparella Ear Head & Neck Institute
    USA
    Wayne State University
    Detroit
    MI
    USA
    Medical College Wisconsin
    Milwaukee
    WI
    USA
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志(英文), 2017, 3 (02)
  • [3] OSA treatment history in an upper airway stimulation trial cohort
    Soose Ryan J.
    Padhya Tapan A.
    Gillespie M. Boyd
    Froymovich Oleg
    Lin Ho-sheng
    Woodson B. Tucker
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    University of South Florida College of Medicine
    Medical University of South Carolina
    Paparella Ear Head & Neck Institute
    Wayne State University
    Medical College Wisconsin
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志英文版, 2017, (02) : 79 - 84
  • [4] Upper Airway Stimulation Response in Older Adults with Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Withrow, Kirk
    Evans, Sean
    Harwick, John
    Kezirian, Eric
    Strollo, Patrick
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 161 (04) : 714 - 719
  • [5] Adherence to Upper-Airway Stimulation in the Treatment of OSA
    Hofauer, Benedikt
    Steffen, Armin
    Knopf, Andreas
    Hasselbacher, Katrin
    Heiser, Clemens
    CHEST, 2018, 153 (02) : 574 - 575
  • [6] Comparison of Traditional Upper Airway Surgery and Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Huntley, Colin
    Boon, Maurits
    Tschopp, Samuel
    Tschopp, Kurt
    Jenks, Carolyn M.
    Thaler, Erica
    Baptista Jardin, Peter
    Shah, Janki
    Kominsky, Alan
    Kezirian, Eric J.
    Heiser, Clemens
    Waxman, Jonathan
    Lin, Ho-Sheng
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 130 (04) : 370 - 376
  • [7] Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Past, Present, and Future
    Dedhia, Raj C.
    Strollo, Patrick J., Jr.
    Soose, Ryan J.
    SLEEP, 2015, 38 (06) : 899 - 906
  • [8] Upper Airway Stimulation for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Torre, Carlos
    Alam, Elie
    Abreu, Alexandre
    Chediak, Alejandro
    CURRENT PULMONOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 10 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [9] Upper Airway Stimulation for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Carlos Torre
    Elie Alam
    Alexandre Abreu
    Alejandro Chediak
    Current Pulmonology Reports, 2021, 10 : 40 - 45
  • [10] Maxillomandibular Advancement and Upper Airway Stimulation: Extrapharyngeal Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Yu, Myeong Sang
    Ibrahim, Badr
    Riley, Robert Wayne
    Liu, Stanley Yung-Chuan
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 13 (03) : 225 - 233