Construction of a novel gene-based model for prognosis prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

被引:116
作者
Zhang, Zedan [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Enyu [1 ,2 ]
Zhuang, Hongkai [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Lu [1 ]
Feng, Xiaoqiang [3 ]
Liu, Jiumin [1 ]
Yu, Yuming [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ Med Coll, Shantou, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Dept Immunol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); Differentially expressed genes (DEGs); Overall survival (OS); Risk score; Nomogram; TCGA; GEO; POOR-PROGNOSIS; EXPRESSION; CANCER; IDENTIFICATION; SURVIVAL; CLASSIFICATION; HETEROGENEITY; METASTASIS; SIGNATURES; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1186/s12935-020-1113-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) comprises the majority of kidney cancer death worldwide, whose incidence and mortality are not promising. Identifying ideal biomarkers to construct a more accurate prognostic model than conventional clinical parameters is crucial. Methods Raw count of RNA-sequencing data and clinicopathological data were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Tumor samples were divided into two sets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened in the whole set and prognosis-related genes were identified from the training set. Their common genes were used in LASSO and best subset regression which were performed to identify the best prognostic 5 genes. The gene-based risk score was developed based on the Cox coefficient of the individual gene. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis were used to assess its prognostic power. GSE29609 dataset from GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database was used to validate the signature. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to screen independent prognostic parameters to construct a nomogram. The predictive power of the nomogram was revealed by time-dependent ROC curves and the calibration plot and verified in the validation set. Finally, Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs and 5 novel genes were performed to suggest the potential biological pathways. Results PADI1, ATP6V0D2, DPP6, C9orf135 and PLG were screened to be significantly related to the prognosis of ccRCC patients. The risk score effectively stratified the patients into high-risk group with poor overall survival (OS) based on survival analysis. AJCC-stage, age, recurrence and risk score were regarded as independent prognostic parameters by Cox regression analysis and were used to construct a nomogram. Time-dependent ROC curves showed the nomogram performed best in 1-, 3- and 5-year survival predictions compared with AJCC-stage and risk score in validation sets. The calibration plot showed good agreement of the nomogram between predicted and observed outcomes. Functional enrichment analysis suggested several enriched biological pathways related to cancer. Conclusions In our study, we constructed a gene-based model integrating clinical prognostic parameters to predict prognosis of ccRCC well, which might provide a reliable prognosis assessment tool for clinician and aid treatment decision-making in the clinic.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Golgi Alpha-Mannosidase II as a Novel Biomarker Predicts Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Li, Chenglong
    Guo, Linjie
    Chen, Fan
    Yu, Weiming
    Rao, Ting
    Ruan, Yuan
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 (06) : 264 - 274
  • [32] Deep learning based prediction of prognosis in nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Heo, Tak Sung
    Choi, Jeong Myeong
    Jeong, Yeong Seok
    Kim, Yu Seop
    Lee, Won Ki
    Kim, Chulho
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [33] Systemic inflammation score predicts postoperative prognosis of patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
    Chang, Y.
    An, H.
    Xu, L.
    Zhu, Y.
    Yang, Y.
    Lin, Z.
    Xu, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 113 (04) : 626 - 633
  • [34] TRIP13 predicts poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Kowalewski, Adam
    Jaworski, Damian
    Antosik, Paulina
    Smolinska, Marta
    Ligmanowska, Joanna
    Grzanka, Dariusz
    Szylberg, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (09): : 2909 - 2918
  • [35] MicroRNA-194 is a Marker for Good Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Nofech-Mozes, Roy
    Khella, Heba W. Z.
    Scorilas, Andreas
    Youssef, Leza
    Krylov, Sergey N.
    Lianidou, Evi
    Sidiropoulos, Konstantinos G.
    Gabril, Manal
    Evans, Andrew
    Yousef, George M.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (04): : 656 - 664
  • [36] Integrative analysis of cross-modal features for the prognosis prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Ning, Zhenyuan
    Pan, Weihao
    Chen, Yuting
    Xiao, Qing
    Zhang, Xinsen
    Luo, Jiaxiu
    Wang, Jian
    Zhang, Yu
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 36 (09) : 2888 - 2895
  • [37] A Novel Immune-Related lncRNA-Based Model for Survival Prediction in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Zhang, Zedan
    Tang, Yanlin
    Liu, Yanjun
    Zhuang, Hongkai
    Lin, Enyu
    Xie, Lu
    Feng, Xiaoqiang
    Tian, Kaiwen
    Zeng, Jiayi
    Liu, Jiumin
    Yu, Yuming
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 2021
  • [38] SOX2 and SOX12 are predictive of prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Gu, Weijie
    Wang, Beihe
    Wan, Fangning
    Wu, Junlong
    Lu, Xiaolin
    Wang, Hongkai
    Ziu, Yao
    Zhang, Hailiang
    Shi, Guohai
    Dai, Bo
    Ye, Dingwei
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (04) : 4564 - 4570
  • [39] COL7A1 Expression Improves Prognosis Prediction for Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Atop of Stage
    Koca, Dzenis
    Seraudie, Irinka
    Jardillier, Remy
    Cochet, Claude
    Filhol, Odile
    Guyon, Laurent
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [40] Construction and validation of a survival prognostic model for clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Li, Chen-Li
    Jiang, Yu-Qian
    Pan, Wei
    Yang, Yan-Li
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2025, 103 (03) : 200 - 212