Breast cancer molecular subclassification and estrogen receptor expression to predict efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines-based chemotherapy: a biomarker study from two randomized trials

被引:74
作者
Conforti, R.
Boulet, T.
Tomasic, G.
Taranchon, E.
Arriagada, R.
Spielmann, M.
Ducourtieux, M.
Soria, J. C.
Tursz, T.
Delaloge, S.
Michiels, S.
Andre, F.
机构
[1] Inst Gustave Roussy, Equipe Accueil 03535, Unite Propre Rech Enseignement Super, Translat Res Unit, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[2] Inst Gustave Roussy, Biostat & Epidemiol Unit, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[3] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Pathol, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[4] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Radiat Oncol, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[5] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Med, F-94805 Villejuif, France
关键词
adjuvant chemotherapy; basal like; breast cancer; estrogen receptor; molecular subclassification;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdm209
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive value of breast cancer molecular subclassification regarding the benefit of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Tumor samples from 823 patients included in two randomized trials that compared an anthracycline-based chemotherapy with no treatment were used to construct a tissue array. Estrogen receptor (ER), Her2, epidermal growth factor receptor, cytokeratine 5/6 expressions were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The potential predictive factors of treatment effect on disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by interaction tests and multivariate analysis. Results: Sixty-four (8%), 98 (12%), 109 (14%) and 527 (66%) patients presented a Her2+/ER-, basal-like, Her2-/ER-/nonbasal and luminal-like breast cancer. ER expression, when assessed by IHC, was an independent predictive factor for the benefit of chemotherapy on DFS (test for interaction, P = 0.0015). The molecular subclassification significantly predicted the efficacy of chemotherapy (test for interaction, P = 0.01), but had no significant added value (P = 0.32) as compared to the ER by treatment interaction. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio for relapse or death of 0.42 [95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.17-1.05], 0.54 (95% CI: 0.27-1.08), 0.35 (95% CI: 0.18-0.68), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.81-1.41) for patients with Her2+/ER-, basal-like, Her2-/ER-/nonbasal and luminal-like tumors, respectively. Conclusion: The breast cancer molecular subclassification was predictive for chemotherapy, efficacy in adjuvant setting, but did not provide significant additional information to ER.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1483
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses
    Abd El-Rehim, DM
    Ball, G
    Pinder, SE
    Rakha, E
    Paish, C
    Robertson, JFR
    Macmillan, D
    Blamey, RW
    Ellis, IO
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) : 340 - 350
  • [2] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [3] Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors:: 5-year follow-up results of French adjuvant study group 05 randomized trial
    Adenis, A
    Bonneterre, J
    Bonneterre, ME
    Pion, JM
    Vanlemmens, L
    Gladieff, L
    de Lafontan, B
    Martel, P
    Mihura, J
    Roché, H
    Gédouin, D
    Kerbrat, P
    Lesimple, T
    Brémond, A
    Devaux, Y
    Delecroix, V
    Fumoleau, P
    Maugard-Louboutin, C
    Namer, M
    Goudier, MJ
    Morice, F
    Montcuquet, P
    Schraub, S
    Coudert, B
    Fargeot, P
    de Gislain, C
    Mayer, F
    Bastit, P
    Chevallier, B
    Grandgirard, A
    Monnier, A
    Sun, X
    Clavère, P
    Ollivier, JP
    Rhein, B
    Roullet, B
    Datchary, J
    Audhuy, B
    Barats, JC
    Kohser, F
    Dides, S
    Ramos, R
    Cattan, A
    Eymard, JC
    Pourny, C
    Weber, B
    de Laroche, G
    Pichon, A
    Seffert, P
    Hayat, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (03) : 602 - 611
  • [4] ALBAIN KS, 2002, P ASCO, V21, P143
  • [5] Results of two randomized trials evaluating adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in 1 146 patients with early breast cancer
    Arriagada, R
    Spielmann, M
    Koscielny, S
    Le Chevalier, T
    Delozier, T
    Rémé-Saumon, M
    Ducourtieux, M
    Tursz, T
    Hill, C
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (05) : 458 - 466
  • [6] Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer
    Berry, DA
    Cirrincione, C
    Henderson, IC
    Citron, ML
    Budman, DR
    Goldstein, LJ
    Martino, S
    Perez, EA
    Muss, HB
    Norton, L
    Hudis, C
    Winer, EP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (14): : 1658 - 1667
  • [7] Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application?
    Brenton, JD
    Carey, LA
    Ahmed, AA
    Caldas, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) : 7350 - 7360
  • [8] THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTOLOGIC GRADE IN LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS OF BREAST-CANCER - A STUDY OF 1,010 PATIENTS, UNIFORMLY TREATED AT THE INSTITUT-GUSTAVE-ROUSSY
    CONTESSO, G
    MOURIESSE, H
    FRIEDMAN, S
    GENIN, J
    SARRAZIN, D
    ROUESSE, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (09) : 1378 - 1386
  • [9] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [10] Goldhirsch A, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1054