EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes

被引:185
作者
Oppe, Mark [1 ]
Rand-Hendriksen, Kim [2 ,3 ]
Shah, Koonal [4 ]
Ramos-Goni, Juan M. [1 ]
Luo, Nan [5 ]
机构
[1] EuroQol Res Fdn, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Akershus Univ Hosp, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, Lorenskog, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, Oslo, Norway
[4] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, 12 Sci Dr 2,Block MD1,11-01D, Singapore 117549, Singapore
关键词
STATES WORSE; MODELING VALUATIONS; VALUE SETS; EQ-5D; VALUES; TTO; PREFERENCES; TRANSFORMATION; POPULATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-016-0404-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The time trade-off (TTO) valuation technique is widely used to determine utility values of health outcomes to inform quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) calculations for use in economic evaluation. Protocols for implementing TTO vary in aspects such as the trade-off framework, iteration procedure and its administration model and method, training of respondents and interviewers, and quality control of data collection. The most widely studied and utilized TTO valuation protocols are the Measurement and Valuation of Health (MVH) protocol, the Paris protocol and the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol, all developed by members of the EuroQol Group. The MVH protocol and its successor, the Paris protocol, were developed for valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states. Both protocols were designed for a trained interviewer to elicit preferences from a respondent using the conventional TTO framework with a fixed time horizon of 10 years and an iteration procedure combining bisection and titration. Developed for valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states, the EQ-VT protocol adopted a composite TTO framework and made use of computer technology to facilitate data collection. Training and monitoring of interviewers and respondents is a pivotal component of the EQ-VT protocol. Research is underway aiming to further improve the EuroQol protocols, which form an important basis for the current practice of health technology assessment in many countries.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1004
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, EQ 5D VALUE SETS INV
  • [2] Are QALYs based on time trade-off comparable? - A systematic review of TTO methodologies
    Arnesen, T
    Trommald, M
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [3] Impact of Transformation of Negative Values and Regression Models on Differences Between the UK and US EQ-5D Time Trade-Off Value Sets
    Augestad, Liv Ariane
    Rand-Hendriksen, Kim
    Kristiansen, Ivar Sonbo
    Stavem, Knut
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2012, 30 (12) : 1203 - 1214
  • [4] Lead versus lag-time trade-off variants: does it make any difference?
    Augustovski, Federico
    Rey-Ares, Lucila
    Irazola, Vilma
    Oppe, Mark
    Devlin, Nancy J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 14 : S25 - S31
  • [5] Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states
    Badia, X
    Roset, M
    Herdman, M
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (07) : 943 - 950
  • [6] Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: Experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs
    Bleichrodt, H
    Johannesson, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (02) : 155 - 175
  • [7] Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?
    Boye, Kristina S.
    Matza, Louis S.
    Feeny, David H.
    Johnston, Joseph A.
    Bowman, Lee
    Jordan, Jessica B.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (03) : 437 - 450
  • [8] Brazier J., 2007, MEASURING VALUING HL
  • [9] EuroQol: The current state of play
    Brooks, R
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [10] Buyse M., 2014, CENTRALIZED STAT MON