SSM/T-2 measurements of regional changes in three-dimensional water vapor fields during ENSO events

被引:8
作者
Blankenship, CB [1 ]
Wilheit, TT [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JD900706
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Observations of water vapor fields are presented from the SSM/T-2 (Special Sensor Microwave Temperature-2) radiometer during both El Nino (November 1997) and La Nina (November 1995). Increased SST associated with the El Nino Southern Oscillation is found to cause enhanced circulation with drying in the upper troposphere of subtropical subsidence zones. Although regional rather than global in nature, this is similar to the effect proposed by Lindzen [1997] that could lead to a negative water vapor feedback. These observations provide a useful test of climate models to see how well they model currently observed interannual changes in the water vapor field. Water vapor profiles were retrieved from SSM/T-2 observations by a physical algorithm for all ocean areas between 40 degreesN and 40 degreesS. These data reveal moistening (drying) in regions of equatorial warming (cooling). They also reveal drying (moistening) of the upper troposphere in subsidence zones to the north and south. Patterns of computed and observed clear-sky OLR changes match changes in upper tropospheric humidity closely, with increased OLR in regions of drying. Partitioning of the water vapor field into changes explained by local SST or rainfall and dynamically induced changes indicates that the changes in subtropical upper tropospheric humidity are caused, in part, by large-scale dynamic effects. Numerical values of area averages and plots of zonally averaged quantities are also presented, although analysis is complicated by compensating processes.
引用
收藏
页码:5239 / 5254
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] *AIR FORC CAMBR RE, 1965, HDB GEOPH SPAC ENV
  • [2] Arrhenius S., 1896, Philos. Mag., V41, P237, DOI [10.1080/14786449608620846, DOI 10.1080/14786449608620846]
  • [3] Berg W, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P580, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0580:AOUTWV>2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] Blankenship CB, 2000, J ATMOS SCI, V57, P939, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0939:ROWVPU>2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] BLANKENSHIP CB, 1997, THESIS TEXAS A M U C
  • [8] INTERCOMPARISON AND INTERPRETATION OF CLIMATE FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN 19 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
    CESS, RD
    POTTER, GL
    BLANCHET, JP
    BOER, GJ
    DELGENIO, AD
    DEQUE, M
    DYMNIKOV, V
    GALIN, V
    GATES, WL
    GHAN, SJ
    KIEHL, JT
    LACIS, AA
    LETREUT, H
    LI, ZX
    LIANG, XZ
    MCAVANEY, BJ
    MELESHKO, VP
    MITCHELL, JFB
    MORCRETTE, JJ
    RANDALL, DA
    RIKUS, L
    ROECKNER, E
    ROYER, JF
    SCHLESE, U
    SHEININ, DA
    SLINGO, A
    SOKOLOV, AP
    TAYLOR, KE
    WASHINGTON, WM
    WETHERALD, RT
    YAGAI, I
    ZHANG, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D10) : 16601 - 16615
  • [9] Relationship between sea surface temperature, vertical dynamics, and the vertical distribution of atmospheric water vapor inferred from TOVS observations
    Chaboureau, JP
    Chedin, A
    Scott, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D18) : 23173 - 23180
  • [10] CHOU MD, 1994, J CLIMATE, V7, P1684, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<1684:CITTPD>2.0.CO