Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR)

被引:10
作者
Shukla, Bhanu [1 ,2 ]
Bidelman, Gavin M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, 4055 North Pk Loop, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Inst Intelligent Syst, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
auditory brainstem response (ABR); Midbrain; Neural phase-locking; Subcortical; speech-in-noise (SIN) perception; NERVE ACTION-POTENTIALS; CLIMATIC TRANSITIONS; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; AUDITORY-CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION; INFORMATION; PITCH; MECHANORECEPTORS; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147643
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In nonlinear systems, the inclusion of low-level noise can paradoxically improve signal detection, a phenomenon known as stochastic resonance (SR). SR has been observed in human hearing whereby sensory thresholds (e.g., signal detection and discrimination) are enhanced in the presence of noise. Here, we asked whether subcortical auditory processing (neural phase locking) shows evidence of SR. We recorded brainstem frequency-following-responses (FFRs) in young, normal-hearing listeners to near-electrophysiological-threshold (40 dB SPL) complex tones composed of 10 iso-amplitude harmonics of 150 Hz fundamental frequency (F0) presented concurrent with low-level noise (+20 to -20 dB SNRs). Though variable and weak across ears, some listeners showed improvement in auditory detection thresholds with subthreshold noise confirming SR psychophysically. At the neural level, low-level FFRs were initially eradicated by noise (expected masking effect) but were surprisingly reinvigorated at select masker levels (local maximum near similar to 35 dB SPL). These data suggest brainstem phase-locking to near threshold periodic stimuli is enhanced in optimal levels of noise, the hallmark of SR. Our findings provide novel evidence for stochastic resonance in the human auditory brainstem and suggest that under some circumstances, noise can actually benefit both the behavioral and neural encoding of complex sounds.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 81 条
[41]  
Krishnan A., 2007, Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical application, P313
[42]   Effect of stimulus polarity on speech evoked auditory brainstem response [J].
Kumar, Kaushlendra ;
Bhat, Jayashree S. ;
D'Costa, Pearl Edna ;
Kumar, Mohan ;
Kalaiah, Mohan Kumar .
AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 3 (01) :52-56
[43]  
Lachaux JP, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P194, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO
[44]  
2-C
[45]  
Lenth Russell V, 2024, CRAN
[46]   Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cercal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance [J].
Levin, JE ;
Miller, JP .
NATURE, 1996, 380 (6570) :165-168
[47]   TRANSFORMED UP-DOWN METHODS IN PSYCHOACOUSTICS [J].
LEVITT, H .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1971, 49 (02) :467-&
[48]  
Lutfi R., 2017, P M ACOUSTICS, V30
[49]   DIFFERENTIAL BRAIN-STEM PATHWAYS FOR CONDUCTION OF AUDITORY FREQUENCY-FOLLOWING RESPONSES [J].
MARSH, JT ;
BROWN, WS ;
SMITH, JC .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1974, 36 (04) :415-424
[50]   The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment [J].
McDonnell, Mark D. ;
Ward, Lawrence M. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 12 (07) :415-U89