The use of simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in localizing the epileptogenic focus in refractory focal epilepsy

被引:8
作者
Vivekananda, Umesh [1 ]
Cao, Chunyan [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [2 ]
Zhang, Jing [2 ]
Rugg-Gunn, Fergus [1 ]
Walker, Matthew C. [1 ]
Litvak, Vladimir [3 ]
Sun, Bomin [2 ]
Zhan, Shikun [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Queen Sq Inst Neurol, Dept Clin & Expt Epilepsy, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[3] UCL, Wellcome Ctr Human Neuroimaging, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3AR, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
magnetoencephalography; stereo-electroencephalography; epilepsy surgery; INTRACRANIAL EEG; MEG; RECORDINGS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1093/braincomms/fcab072
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Both magnetoencephalography and stereo-electroencephalography are used in presurgical epilepsy assessment, with contrasting advantages and limitations. It is not known whether simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography recording confers an advantage over both individual modalities, in particular whether magnetoencephalography can provide spatial context to epileptiform activity seen on stereo-electroencephalography. Twenty-four adult and paediatric patients who underwent stereo-electroencephalography study for pre-surgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, were recorded using simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography, of which 14 had abnormal interictal activity during recording. The 14 patients were divided into two groups; those with detected superficial (n = 7) and deep (n = 7) brain interictal activity. Interictal spikes were independently identified in stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Magnetoencephalography dipoles were derived using a distributed inverse method. There was no significant difference between stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in detecting superficial spikes (P = 0.135) and stereo-electroencephalography was significantly better at detecting deep spikes (P = 0.002). Mean distance across patients between stereo-electroencephalography channel with highest average spike amplitude and magnetoencephalography dipole was 20.7 +/- 4.4 mm. for superficial sources, and 17.8 +/- 3.7 mm. for deep sources, even though for some of the latter (n = 4) no magnetoencephalography spikes were detected and magnetoencephalography dipole was fitted to a stereo-electroencephalography interictal activity triggered average. Removal of magnetoencephalography dipole was associated with 1 year seizure freedom in 6/7 patients with superficial source, and 5/6 patients with deep source. Although stereo-electroencephalography has greater sensitivity in identifying interictal activity from deeper sources, a magnetoencephalography source can be localized using stereo-electroencephalography information, thereby providing useful whole brain context to stereo-electroencephalography and potential role in epilepsy surgery planning.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The correlation of magnetoencephalography to intracranial EEG in localizing the epileptogenic zone: A study of the surgical resection outcome [J].
Almubarak, Salah ;
Alexopoulos, Andreas ;
Von-Podewils, Felix ;
Wang, Z. Irene ;
Kakisaka, Yosuke ;
Mosher, John C. ;
Bulacio, Juan ;
Gonzalez-Martinez, Jorge ;
Bingaman, Williams ;
Burgess, Richard C. .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2014, 108 (09) :1581-1590
[2]   Assessment of Subcortical Source Localization Using Deep Brain Activity Imaging Model with Minimum Norm Operators: A MEG Study [J].
Attal, Yohan ;
Schwartz, Denis .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03)
[3]   Technical solutions for simultaneous MEG and SEEG recordings: towards routine clinical use [J].
Badier, J. M. ;
Dubarry, A. S. ;
Gavaret, M. ;
Chen, S. ;
Trebuchon, A. S. ;
Marquis, P. ;
Regis, J. ;
Bartolomei, F. ;
Benar, C. G. ;
Carron, R. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 38 (10) :N118-N127
[4]   MEG VERSUS EEG LOCALIZATION TEST USING IMPLANTED SOURCES IN THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
COHEN, D ;
CUFFIN, BN ;
YUNOKUCHI, K ;
MANIEWSKI, R ;
PURCELL, C ;
COSGROVE, GR ;
IVES, J ;
KENNEDY, JG ;
SCHOMER, DL .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 28 (06) :811-817
[5]   The long-term outcome of adult epilepsy surgery, patterns of seizure remission, and relapse: a cohort study [J].
de Tisi, Jane ;
Bell, Gail S. ;
Peacock, Janet L. ;
McEvoy, Andrew W. ;
Harkness, William F. J. ;
Sander, Josemir W. ;
Duncan, John S. .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9800) :1388-1395
[6]   Simultaneous SEEG-MEG-EEG recordings Overcome the SEEG limited spatial sampling [J].
Gavaret, Martine ;
Dubarry, Anne-Sophie ;
Carron, Romain ;
Bartolomei, Fabrice ;
Trebuchon, Agnes ;
Benar, Christian-George .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2016, 128 :68-72
[7]   MEG AND EEG IN EPILEPSY - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE [J].
GUY, CN ;
WALKER, S ;
ALARCON, G ;
BINNIE, CD ;
CHESTERMAN, P ;
FENWICK, P ;
SMITH, S .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 14 :A99-A102
[8]   MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY - THEORY, INSTRUMENTATION, AND APPLICATIONS TO NONINVASIVE STUDIES OF THE WORKING HUMAN BRAIN [J].
HAMALAINEN, M ;
HARI, R ;
ILMONIEMI, RJ ;
KNUUTILA, J ;
LOUNASMAA, OV .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1993, 65 (02) :413-497
[9]   A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex [J].
Hillebrand, A ;
Barnes, GR .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (03) :638-650
[10]   Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram in epilepsy surgery: A prospective study [J].
Knowlton, RC ;
Elgavish, R ;
Howell, J ;
Blount, J ;
Burneo, JG ;
Faught, E ;
Kankirawatana, P ;
Riley, K ;
Morawetz, R ;
Worthington, J ;
Kuzniecky, RI .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 59 (05) :835-842