The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists

被引:6
作者
Hanley, J. Richard [1 ]
Shah, Nikita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Irrelevant sound; Suffix effect; UNATTENDED SPEECH; WORKING-MEMORY; FEATURE MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/09658211.2012.670249
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The relationship between the suffix effect and the effect of irrelevant sound on serial recall of auditorily presented lists is investigated in this study. Contrary to the predictions of the phonological loop model, Hanley and Hayes (2012) reported that the irrelevant sound effect was abolished under articulatory suppression when a spoken suffix was added at the end of the list. The experiment reported in this paper uses a shorter list length (five items per list) than that employed by Hanley and Hayes. This is because it cannot realistically be argued that participants will abandon the use of phonological codes to retain the list items with sequences as short as this. Results replicated those of Hanley and Hayes (2012). There was a significant effect of irrelevant sound under articulatory suppression when the list items were followed by an auditory tone. Crucially, however, the effect of irrelevant sound under articulatory suppression was abolished when the list items were followed by a spoken suffix.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 419
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[2]  
Baddeley A.D., 2007, WORKING MEMORY THOUG
[3]   The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for a "perceptual-gestural" alternative [J].
Baddeley, Alan D. ;
Larsen, Janet D. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (04) :497-504
[4]   The Irrelevant Sound Effect Under Articulatory Suppression: Is It a Suffix Effect? [J].
Hanley, J. Richard ;
Hayes, Annabel .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (02) :482-487
[5]   Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect? [J].
Hanley, JR .
MEMORY, 1997, 5 (03) :423-431
[6]   THE EFFECT OF UNATTENDED SPEECH ON SERIAL-RECALL FOLLOWING AUDITORY PRESENTATION [J].
HANLEY, JR ;
BROADBENT, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 78 :287-297
[7]   Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model [J].
Hanley, JR ;
Bakopoulou, E .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (02) :435-444
[8]   The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store? [J].
Jones, DM ;
Macken, WJ ;
Nicholls, AP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (03) :656-674
[9]  
Klatte M, 2002, PSYCHOLOGISCHE BEITR, V44, P166
[10]   A FEATURE MODEL OF IMMEDIATE MEMORY [J].
NAIRNE, JS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1990, 18 (03) :251-269